Three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections with a nontypical geomagnetic response

Autores
Rodriguez, L.; Zhukov, A. N.; Cid, C.; Cerrato, Y.; Saiz, E.; Cremades, H.; Dasso, Sergio Ricardo; Menvielle, M.; Aran, A.; Mandrini, Cristina Hemilse; Poedts, S.; Schmieder, B.
Año de publicación
2009
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Forecasting potential geoeffectiveness of solar disturbances (in particular, of frontside full halo coronal mass ejections) is important for various practical purposes, e.g. for satellite operations, radio communications, global positioning system applications, power grid and pipeline maintenance. We analyze three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that occurred in the year 2000 (close to the activity maximum of solar cycle 23), together with associated solar and heliospheric phenomena as well as their impact on the Earth?s magnetosphere. Even though all three were fast full halos (with plane of the sky speeds higher than 1100 km/s), the geomagnetic response was very different for each case. After analyzing the source regions of these halo CMEs, it was found that the halo associated with the strongest geomagnetic disturbance was the one that initiated farther away from disk center (source region at W66); while the other two CMEs originated closer to the central meridian but had weaker geomagnetic
responses. Therefore, these three events do not fit into the general statistical trends that relate the location of the solar source and the corresponding geoeffectivity. We investigate possible causes of such a behavior. Non-radial direction of eruption, passage of the Earth through a leg of an interplanetary flux rope and strong compression at the eastern flank of a propagating ICME during its interaction with the ambient solar wind are found to be important factors that have a direct influence on the resulting north?south interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) component and thus on the CME geoeffectiveness. We also find indications that interaction of two CMEs could help in producing a longlasting southward IMF component. Finally, we are able to explain successfully the geomagnetic response using plasma and magnetic field in situ measurements at the L1 point. We discuss the implications of our results for operational space weather forecasting and stress the difficulties of making accurate predictions with the current knowledge and tools at hand.
Fil: Rodriguez, L.. Royal Observatory of Belgium; Bélgica
Fil: Zhukov, A. N.. Royal Observatory of Belgium; Bélgica
Fil: Cid, C.. Universidad de Alcalá; España
Fil: Cerrato, Y.. Universidad de Alcalá; España
Fil: Saiz, E.. Universidad de Alcalá; España
Fil: Cremades, H.. Universidad Tecnologica Nacional; Argentina
Fil: Dasso, Sergio Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciónes Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio. - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio; Argentina
Fil: Menvielle, M.. Centre d’Etude des Environnements Terrestre et Planetaires; Francia
Fil: Aran, A.. Universidad de Barcelona; España
Fil: Mandrini, Cristina Hemilse. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciónes Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio. - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio; Argentina
Fil: Poedts, S.. Catholic University Leuven; Bélgica
Fil: Schmieder, B.. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Observatoire de Paris; Francia
Materia
Space Weather: Forecasting
Space Weather: Magnetic storms
Space Weather: Solar effects
Space Weather: General or miscellaneous
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/21930

id CONICETDig_1fa2f8f78acbdbf3b77cef5c5111c7a6
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/21930
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections with a nontypical geomagnetic responseRodriguez, L.Zhukov, A. N.Cid, C.Cerrato, Y.Saiz, E.Cremades, H.Dasso, Sergio RicardoMenvielle, M.Aran, A.Mandrini, Cristina HemilsePoedts, S.Schmieder, B.Space Weather: ForecastingSpace Weather: Magnetic stormsSpace Weather: Solar effectsSpace Weather: General or miscellaneoushttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Forecasting potential geoeffectiveness of solar disturbances (in particular, of frontside full halo coronal mass ejections) is important for various practical purposes, e.g. for satellite operations, radio communications, global positioning system applications, power grid and pipeline maintenance. We analyze three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that occurred in the year 2000 (close to the activity maximum of solar cycle 23), together with associated solar and heliospheric phenomena as well as their impact on the Earth?s magnetosphere. Even though all three were fast full halos (with plane of the sky speeds higher than 1100 km/s), the geomagnetic response was very different for each case. After analyzing the source regions of these halo CMEs, it was found that the halo associated with the strongest geomagnetic disturbance was the one that initiated farther away from disk center (source region at W66); while the other two CMEs originated closer to the central meridian but had weaker geomagnetic<br />responses. Therefore, these three events do not fit into the general statistical trends that relate the location of the solar source and the corresponding geoeffectivity. We investigate possible causes of such a behavior. Non-radial direction of eruption, passage of the Earth through a leg of an interplanetary flux rope and strong compression at the eastern flank of a propagating ICME during its interaction with the ambient solar wind are found to be important factors that have a direct influence on the resulting north?south interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) component and thus on the CME geoeffectiveness. We also find indications that interaction of two CMEs could help in producing a longlasting southward IMF component. Finally, we are able to explain successfully the geomagnetic response using plasma and magnetic field in situ measurements at the L1 point. We discuss the implications of our results for operational space weather forecasting and stress the difficulties of making accurate predictions with the current knowledge and tools at hand.Fil: Rodriguez, L.. Royal Observatory of Belgium; BélgicaFil: Zhukov, A. N.. Royal Observatory of Belgium; BélgicaFil: Cid, C.. Universidad de Alcalá; EspañaFil: Cerrato, Y.. Universidad de Alcalá; EspañaFil: Saiz, E.. Universidad de Alcalá; EspañaFil: Cremades, H.. Universidad Tecnologica Nacional; ArgentinaFil: Dasso, Sergio Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciónes Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio. - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio; ArgentinaFil: Menvielle, M.. Centre d’Etude des Environnements Terrestre et Planetaires; FranciaFil: Aran, A.. Universidad de Barcelona; EspañaFil: Mandrini, Cristina Hemilse. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciónes Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio. - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio; ArgentinaFil: Poedts, S.. Catholic University Leuven; BélgicaFil: Schmieder, B.. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Observatoire de Paris; FranciaAmerican Geophysical Union2009-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/21930Rodriguez, L.; Zhukov, A. N.; Cid, C.; Cerrato, Y.; Saiz, E.; et al.; Three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections with a nontypical geomagnetic response; American Geophysical Union; Space Weather-the International Journal Of Research And Applications; 7; 6; 6-2009; 1-191542-7390CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2008SW000453/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1029/2008SW000453info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:42:41Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/21930instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:42:41.653CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections with a nontypical geomagnetic response
title Three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections with a nontypical geomagnetic response
spellingShingle Three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections with a nontypical geomagnetic response
Rodriguez, L.
Space Weather: Forecasting
Space Weather: Magnetic storms
Space Weather: Solar effects
Space Weather: General or miscellaneous
title_short Three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections with a nontypical geomagnetic response
title_full Three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections with a nontypical geomagnetic response
title_fullStr Three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections with a nontypical geomagnetic response
title_full_unstemmed Three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections with a nontypical geomagnetic response
title_sort Three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections with a nontypical geomagnetic response
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rodriguez, L.
Zhukov, A. N.
Cid, C.
Cerrato, Y.
Saiz, E.
Cremades, H.
Dasso, Sergio Ricardo
Menvielle, M.
Aran, A.
Mandrini, Cristina Hemilse
Poedts, S.
Schmieder, B.
author Rodriguez, L.
author_facet Rodriguez, L.
Zhukov, A. N.
Cid, C.
Cerrato, Y.
Saiz, E.
Cremades, H.
Dasso, Sergio Ricardo
Menvielle, M.
Aran, A.
Mandrini, Cristina Hemilse
Poedts, S.
Schmieder, B.
author_role author
author2 Zhukov, A. N.
Cid, C.
Cerrato, Y.
Saiz, E.
Cremades, H.
Dasso, Sergio Ricardo
Menvielle, M.
Aran, A.
Mandrini, Cristina Hemilse
Poedts, S.
Schmieder, B.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Space Weather: Forecasting
Space Weather: Magnetic storms
Space Weather: Solar effects
Space Weather: General or miscellaneous
topic Space Weather: Forecasting
Space Weather: Magnetic storms
Space Weather: Solar effects
Space Weather: General or miscellaneous
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Forecasting potential geoeffectiveness of solar disturbances (in particular, of frontside full halo coronal mass ejections) is important for various practical purposes, e.g. for satellite operations, radio communications, global positioning system applications, power grid and pipeline maintenance. We analyze three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that occurred in the year 2000 (close to the activity maximum of solar cycle 23), together with associated solar and heliospheric phenomena as well as their impact on the Earth?s magnetosphere. Even though all three were fast full halos (with plane of the sky speeds higher than 1100 km/s), the geomagnetic response was very different for each case. After analyzing the source regions of these halo CMEs, it was found that the halo associated with the strongest geomagnetic disturbance was the one that initiated farther away from disk center (source region at W66); while the other two CMEs originated closer to the central meridian but had weaker geomagnetic<br />responses. Therefore, these three events do not fit into the general statistical trends that relate the location of the solar source and the corresponding geoeffectivity. We investigate possible causes of such a behavior. Non-radial direction of eruption, passage of the Earth through a leg of an interplanetary flux rope and strong compression at the eastern flank of a propagating ICME during its interaction with the ambient solar wind are found to be important factors that have a direct influence on the resulting north?south interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) component and thus on the CME geoeffectiveness. We also find indications that interaction of two CMEs could help in producing a longlasting southward IMF component. Finally, we are able to explain successfully the geomagnetic response using plasma and magnetic field in situ measurements at the L1 point. We discuss the implications of our results for operational space weather forecasting and stress the difficulties of making accurate predictions with the current knowledge and tools at hand.
Fil: Rodriguez, L.. Royal Observatory of Belgium; Bélgica
Fil: Zhukov, A. N.. Royal Observatory of Belgium; Bélgica
Fil: Cid, C.. Universidad de Alcalá; España
Fil: Cerrato, Y.. Universidad de Alcalá; España
Fil: Saiz, E.. Universidad de Alcalá; España
Fil: Cremades, H.. Universidad Tecnologica Nacional; Argentina
Fil: Dasso, Sergio Ricardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciónes Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio. - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio; Argentina
Fil: Menvielle, M.. Centre d’Etude des Environnements Terrestre et Planetaires; Francia
Fil: Aran, A.. Universidad de Barcelona; España
Fil: Mandrini, Cristina Hemilse. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciónes Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio. - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio; Argentina
Fil: Poedts, S.. Catholic University Leuven; Bélgica
Fil: Schmieder, B.. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Observatoire de Paris; Francia
description Forecasting potential geoeffectiveness of solar disturbances (in particular, of frontside full halo coronal mass ejections) is important for various practical purposes, e.g. for satellite operations, radio communications, global positioning system applications, power grid and pipeline maintenance. We analyze three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that occurred in the year 2000 (close to the activity maximum of solar cycle 23), together with associated solar and heliospheric phenomena as well as their impact on the Earth?s magnetosphere. Even though all three were fast full halos (with plane of the sky speeds higher than 1100 km/s), the geomagnetic response was very different for each case. After analyzing the source regions of these halo CMEs, it was found that the halo associated with the strongest geomagnetic disturbance was the one that initiated farther away from disk center (source region at W66); while the other two CMEs originated closer to the central meridian but had weaker geomagnetic<br />responses. Therefore, these three events do not fit into the general statistical trends that relate the location of the solar source and the corresponding geoeffectivity. We investigate possible causes of such a behavior. Non-radial direction of eruption, passage of the Earth through a leg of an interplanetary flux rope and strong compression at the eastern flank of a propagating ICME during its interaction with the ambient solar wind are found to be important factors that have a direct influence on the resulting north?south interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) component and thus on the CME geoeffectiveness. We also find indications that interaction of two CMEs could help in producing a longlasting southward IMF component. Finally, we are able to explain successfully the geomagnetic response using plasma and magnetic field in situ measurements at the L1 point. We discuss the implications of our results for operational space weather forecasting and stress the difficulties of making accurate predictions with the current knowledge and tools at hand.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/21930
Rodriguez, L.; Zhukov, A. N.; Cid, C.; Cerrato, Y.; Saiz, E.; et al.; Three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections with a nontypical geomagnetic response; American Geophysical Union; Space Weather-the International Journal Of Research And Applications; 7; 6; 6-2009; 1-19
1542-7390
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/21930
identifier_str_mv Rodriguez, L.; Zhukov, A. N.; Cid, C.; Cerrato, Y.; Saiz, E.; et al.; Three frontside full halo coronal mass ejections with a nontypical geomagnetic response; American Geophysical Union; Space Weather-the International Journal Of Research And Applications; 7; 6; 6-2009; 1-19
1542-7390
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2008SW000453/abstract
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1029/2008SW000453
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Geophysical Union
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Geophysical Union
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614460534161408
score 13.070432