Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking

Autores
Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.; Mazzeo, Nestor; Díaz, Ismael; Barral, María Paula; Piñeiro, Gervasio; Gadino, Isabel; Roche, Ingid; Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Amazonia is under threat. Biodiversity and redundancy loss in the Amazon biome severely limits the long-term provision of key ecosystem services in diverse spatial scales (local, regional, and global). Resilience thinking attempts to understand the mechanisms that ensure a system’s capacity to recover in the face of external pressures, trauma, or disturbances, as well as changes in its internal dynamics. Resilience thinking also promotes relevant transformations of system configurations considered adverse or nonsustainable, and therefore proposes the simultaneous analysis of the adaptive capacity and the transformation of a system. In this context, seven principles have been proposed, which are considered crucial for social-ecological systems to become resilient. These seven principles of resilience thinking are analyzed in terms of the land use planning and land management of the Amazonian biome. To comprehend its main conflicts, challenges, and opportunities, we reveal the key aspects of the historical process of Latin America’s land management and the Amazon basin’s past and current land use changes. Based on this review, the Amazon region shows two concrete challenges for resilience: (1) the natural system’s fragmentation, as a consequence of land use limiting key ecological processes, and (2) the cultural and institutional fragmentation of land use projects designed and partially implemented in the region. In addition, the region presents challenges related to institutional design, the expansion and strengthening of real participation spaces, and the promotion of social learning. Finally, polycentric and adaptive governance is itself a major, urgent need for this region and its social-ecological complexity.
Fil: Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.. Universidad de Bogota Jorge Tadeo Lozano (utadeo);
Fil: Mazzeo, Nestor. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay. South American Institute for Resilience and Sustainability Studies; Uruguay
Fil: Díaz, Ismael. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay
Fil: Barral, María Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Piñeiro, Gervasio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Gadino, Isabel. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay
Fil: Roche, Ingid. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay
Fil: Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana. Conservation International Foundation; Colombia
Materia
AMAZON BASIN
LAND USE PLANNING
LATIN AMERICA
RESILIENCE PRINCIPLES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/184941

id CONICETDig_1d0bdc0300ee20cdf3dda8594e2fed2f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/184941
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinkingRuiz Agudelo, Cesar A.Mazzeo, NestorDíaz, IsmaelBarral, María PaulaPiñeiro, GervasioGadino, IsabelRoche, IngidAcuña Posada, Rocio JulianaAMAZON BASINLAND USE PLANNINGLATIN AMERICARESILIENCE PRINCIPLEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Amazonia is under threat. Biodiversity and redundancy loss in the Amazon biome severely limits the long-term provision of key ecosystem services in diverse spatial scales (local, regional, and global). Resilience thinking attempts to understand the mechanisms that ensure a system’s capacity to recover in the face of external pressures, trauma, or disturbances, as well as changes in its internal dynamics. Resilience thinking also promotes relevant transformations of system configurations considered adverse or nonsustainable, and therefore proposes the simultaneous analysis of the adaptive capacity and the transformation of a system. In this context, seven principles have been proposed, which are considered crucial for social-ecological systems to become resilient. These seven principles of resilience thinking are analyzed in terms of the land use planning and land management of the Amazonian biome. To comprehend its main conflicts, challenges, and opportunities, we reveal the key aspects of the historical process of Latin America’s land management and the Amazon basin’s past and current land use changes. Based on this review, the Amazon region shows two concrete challenges for resilience: (1) the natural system’s fragmentation, as a consequence of land use limiting key ecological processes, and (2) the cultural and institutional fragmentation of land use projects designed and partially implemented in the region. In addition, the region presents challenges related to institutional design, the expansion and strengthening of real participation spaces, and the promotion of social learning. Finally, polycentric and adaptive governance is itself a major, urgent need for this region and its social-ecological complexity.Fil: Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.. Universidad de Bogota Jorge Tadeo Lozano (utadeo);Fil: Mazzeo, Nestor. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay. South American Institute for Resilience and Sustainability Studies; UruguayFil: Díaz, Ismael. Universidad de la Republica; UruguayFil: Barral, María Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Piñeiro, Gervasio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaFil: Gadino, Isabel. Universidad de la Republica; UruguayFil: Roche, Ingid. Universidad de la Republica; UruguayFil: Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana. Conservation International Foundation; ColombiaResilience Alliance2020-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/184941Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.; Mazzeo, Nestor; Díaz, Ismael; Barral, María Paula; Piñeiro, Gervasio; et al.; Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 25; 1; 3-2020; 1-181708-3087CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss1/art8/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5751/ES-11352-250108info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:59:46Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/184941instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:59:46.864CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking
title Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking
spellingShingle Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking
Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.
AMAZON BASIN
LAND USE PLANNING
LATIN AMERICA
RESILIENCE PRINCIPLES
title_short Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking
title_full Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking
title_fullStr Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking
title_full_unstemmed Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking
title_sort Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.
Mazzeo, Nestor
Díaz, Ismael
Barral, María Paula
Piñeiro, Gervasio
Gadino, Isabel
Roche, Ingid
Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana
author Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.
author_facet Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.
Mazzeo, Nestor
Díaz, Ismael
Barral, María Paula
Piñeiro, Gervasio
Gadino, Isabel
Roche, Ingid
Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana
author_role author
author2 Mazzeo, Nestor
Díaz, Ismael
Barral, María Paula
Piñeiro, Gervasio
Gadino, Isabel
Roche, Ingid
Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv AMAZON BASIN
LAND USE PLANNING
LATIN AMERICA
RESILIENCE PRINCIPLES
topic AMAZON BASIN
LAND USE PLANNING
LATIN AMERICA
RESILIENCE PRINCIPLES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Amazonia is under threat. Biodiversity and redundancy loss in the Amazon biome severely limits the long-term provision of key ecosystem services in diverse spatial scales (local, regional, and global). Resilience thinking attempts to understand the mechanisms that ensure a system’s capacity to recover in the face of external pressures, trauma, or disturbances, as well as changes in its internal dynamics. Resilience thinking also promotes relevant transformations of system configurations considered adverse or nonsustainable, and therefore proposes the simultaneous analysis of the adaptive capacity and the transformation of a system. In this context, seven principles have been proposed, which are considered crucial for social-ecological systems to become resilient. These seven principles of resilience thinking are analyzed in terms of the land use planning and land management of the Amazonian biome. To comprehend its main conflicts, challenges, and opportunities, we reveal the key aspects of the historical process of Latin America’s land management and the Amazon basin’s past and current land use changes. Based on this review, the Amazon region shows two concrete challenges for resilience: (1) the natural system’s fragmentation, as a consequence of land use limiting key ecological processes, and (2) the cultural and institutional fragmentation of land use projects designed and partially implemented in the region. In addition, the region presents challenges related to institutional design, the expansion and strengthening of real participation spaces, and the promotion of social learning. Finally, polycentric and adaptive governance is itself a major, urgent need for this region and its social-ecological complexity.
Fil: Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.. Universidad de Bogota Jorge Tadeo Lozano (utadeo);
Fil: Mazzeo, Nestor. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay. South American Institute for Resilience and Sustainability Studies; Uruguay
Fil: Díaz, Ismael. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay
Fil: Barral, María Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Piñeiro, Gervasio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Gadino, Isabel. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay
Fil: Roche, Ingid. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay
Fil: Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana. Conservation International Foundation; Colombia
description Amazonia is under threat. Biodiversity and redundancy loss in the Amazon biome severely limits the long-term provision of key ecosystem services in diverse spatial scales (local, regional, and global). Resilience thinking attempts to understand the mechanisms that ensure a system’s capacity to recover in the face of external pressures, trauma, or disturbances, as well as changes in its internal dynamics. Resilience thinking also promotes relevant transformations of system configurations considered adverse or nonsustainable, and therefore proposes the simultaneous analysis of the adaptive capacity and the transformation of a system. In this context, seven principles have been proposed, which are considered crucial for social-ecological systems to become resilient. These seven principles of resilience thinking are analyzed in terms of the land use planning and land management of the Amazonian biome. To comprehend its main conflicts, challenges, and opportunities, we reveal the key aspects of the historical process of Latin America’s land management and the Amazon basin’s past and current land use changes. Based on this review, the Amazon region shows two concrete challenges for resilience: (1) the natural system’s fragmentation, as a consequence of land use limiting key ecological processes, and (2) the cultural and institutional fragmentation of land use projects designed and partially implemented in the region. In addition, the region presents challenges related to institutional design, the expansion and strengthening of real participation spaces, and the promotion of social learning. Finally, polycentric and adaptive governance is itself a major, urgent need for this region and its social-ecological complexity.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/184941
Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.; Mazzeo, Nestor; Díaz, Ismael; Barral, María Paula; Piñeiro, Gervasio; et al.; Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 25; 1; 3-2020; 1-18
1708-3087
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/184941
identifier_str_mv Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.; Mazzeo, Nestor; Díaz, Ismael; Barral, María Paula; Piñeiro, Gervasio; et al.; Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 25; 1; 3-2020; 1-18
1708-3087
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss1/art8/
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5751/ES-11352-250108
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Resilience Alliance
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Resilience Alliance
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613770994778112
score 13.070432