Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking
- Autores
- Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.; Mazzeo, Nestor; Díaz, Ismael; Barral, María Paula; Piñeiro, Gervasio; Gadino, Isabel; Roche, Ingid; Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Amazonia is under threat. Biodiversity and redundancy loss in the Amazon biome severely limits the long-term provision of key ecosystem services in diverse spatial scales (local, regional, and global). Resilience thinking attempts to understand the mechanisms that ensure a system’s capacity to recover in the face of external pressures, trauma, or disturbances, as well as changes in its internal dynamics. Resilience thinking also promotes relevant transformations of system configurations considered adverse or nonsustainable, and therefore proposes the simultaneous analysis of the adaptive capacity and the transformation of a system. In this context, seven principles have been proposed, which are considered crucial for social-ecological systems to become resilient. These seven principles of resilience thinking are analyzed in terms of the land use planning and land management of the Amazonian biome. To comprehend its main conflicts, challenges, and opportunities, we reveal the key aspects of the historical process of Latin America’s land management and the Amazon basin’s past and current land use changes. Based on this review, the Amazon region shows two concrete challenges for resilience: (1) the natural system’s fragmentation, as a consequence of land use limiting key ecological processes, and (2) the cultural and institutional fragmentation of land use projects designed and partially implemented in the region. In addition, the region presents challenges related to institutional design, the expansion and strengthening of real participation spaces, and the promotion of social learning. Finally, polycentric and adaptive governance is itself a major, urgent need for this region and its social-ecological complexity.
Fil: Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.. Universidad de Bogota Jorge Tadeo Lozano (utadeo);
Fil: Mazzeo, Nestor. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay. South American Institute for Resilience and Sustainability Studies; Uruguay
Fil: Díaz, Ismael. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay
Fil: Barral, María Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina
Fil: Piñeiro, Gervasio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Gadino, Isabel. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay
Fil: Roche, Ingid. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay
Fil: Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana. Conservation International Foundation; Colombia - Materia
-
AMAZON BASIN
LAND USE PLANNING
LATIN AMERICA
RESILIENCE PRINCIPLES - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/184941
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_1d0bdc0300ee20cdf3dda8594e2fed2f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/184941 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinkingRuiz Agudelo, Cesar A.Mazzeo, NestorDíaz, IsmaelBarral, María PaulaPiñeiro, GervasioGadino, IsabelRoche, IngidAcuña Posada, Rocio JulianaAMAZON BASINLAND USE PLANNINGLATIN AMERICARESILIENCE PRINCIPLEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Amazonia is under threat. Biodiversity and redundancy loss in the Amazon biome severely limits the long-term provision of key ecosystem services in diverse spatial scales (local, regional, and global). Resilience thinking attempts to understand the mechanisms that ensure a system’s capacity to recover in the face of external pressures, trauma, or disturbances, as well as changes in its internal dynamics. Resilience thinking also promotes relevant transformations of system configurations considered adverse or nonsustainable, and therefore proposes the simultaneous analysis of the adaptive capacity and the transformation of a system. In this context, seven principles have been proposed, which are considered crucial for social-ecological systems to become resilient. These seven principles of resilience thinking are analyzed in terms of the land use planning and land management of the Amazonian biome. To comprehend its main conflicts, challenges, and opportunities, we reveal the key aspects of the historical process of Latin America’s land management and the Amazon basin’s past and current land use changes. Based on this review, the Amazon region shows two concrete challenges for resilience: (1) the natural system’s fragmentation, as a consequence of land use limiting key ecological processes, and (2) the cultural and institutional fragmentation of land use projects designed and partially implemented in the region. In addition, the region presents challenges related to institutional design, the expansion and strengthening of real participation spaces, and the promotion of social learning. Finally, polycentric and adaptive governance is itself a major, urgent need for this region and its social-ecological complexity.Fil: Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.. Universidad de Bogota Jorge Tadeo Lozano (utadeo);Fil: Mazzeo, Nestor. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay. South American Institute for Resilience and Sustainability Studies; UruguayFil: Díaz, Ismael. Universidad de la Republica; UruguayFil: Barral, María Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; ArgentinaFil: Piñeiro, Gervasio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaFil: Gadino, Isabel. Universidad de la Republica; UruguayFil: Roche, Ingid. Universidad de la Republica; UruguayFil: Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana. Conservation International Foundation; ColombiaResilience Alliance2020-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/184941Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.; Mazzeo, Nestor; Díaz, Ismael; Barral, María Paula; Piñeiro, Gervasio; et al.; Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 25; 1; 3-2020; 1-181708-3087CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss1/art8/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5751/ES-11352-250108info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:59:46Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/184941instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:59:46.864CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking |
title |
Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking |
spellingShingle |
Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A. AMAZON BASIN LAND USE PLANNING LATIN AMERICA RESILIENCE PRINCIPLES |
title_short |
Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking |
title_full |
Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking |
title_fullStr |
Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking |
title_full_unstemmed |
Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking |
title_sort |
Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A. Mazzeo, Nestor Díaz, Ismael Barral, María Paula Piñeiro, Gervasio Gadino, Isabel Roche, Ingid Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana |
author |
Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A. |
author_facet |
Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A. Mazzeo, Nestor Díaz, Ismael Barral, María Paula Piñeiro, Gervasio Gadino, Isabel Roche, Ingid Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mazzeo, Nestor Díaz, Ismael Barral, María Paula Piñeiro, Gervasio Gadino, Isabel Roche, Ingid Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
AMAZON BASIN LAND USE PLANNING LATIN AMERICA RESILIENCE PRINCIPLES |
topic |
AMAZON BASIN LAND USE PLANNING LATIN AMERICA RESILIENCE PRINCIPLES |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Amazonia is under threat. Biodiversity and redundancy loss in the Amazon biome severely limits the long-term provision of key ecosystem services in diverse spatial scales (local, regional, and global). Resilience thinking attempts to understand the mechanisms that ensure a system’s capacity to recover in the face of external pressures, trauma, or disturbances, as well as changes in its internal dynamics. Resilience thinking also promotes relevant transformations of system configurations considered adverse or nonsustainable, and therefore proposes the simultaneous analysis of the adaptive capacity and the transformation of a system. In this context, seven principles have been proposed, which are considered crucial for social-ecological systems to become resilient. These seven principles of resilience thinking are analyzed in terms of the land use planning and land management of the Amazonian biome. To comprehend its main conflicts, challenges, and opportunities, we reveal the key aspects of the historical process of Latin America’s land management and the Amazon basin’s past and current land use changes. Based on this review, the Amazon region shows two concrete challenges for resilience: (1) the natural system’s fragmentation, as a consequence of land use limiting key ecological processes, and (2) the cultural and institutional fragmentation of land use projects designed and partially implemented in the region. In addition, the region presents challenges related to institutional design, the expansion and strengthening of real participation spaces, and the promotion of social learning. Finally, polycentric and adaptive governance is itself a major, urgent need for this region and its social-ecological complexity. Fil: Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.. Universidad de Bogota Jorge Tadeo Lozano (utadeo); Fil: Mazzeo, Nestor. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay. South American Institute for Resilience and Sustainability Studies; Uruguay Fil: Díaz, Ismael. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay Fil: Barral, María Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina Fil: Piñeiro, Gervasio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina Fil: Gadino, Isabel. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay Fil: Roche, Ingid. Universidad de la Republica; Uruguay Fil: Acuña Posada, Rocio Juliana. Conservation International Foundation; Colombia |
description |
Amazonia is under threat. Biodiversity and redundancy loss in the Amazon biome severely limits the long-term provision of key ecosystem services in diverse spatial scales (local, regional, and global). Resilience thinking attempts to understand the mechanisms that ensure a system’s capacity to recover in the face of external pressures, trauma, or disturbances, as well as changes in its internal dynamics. Resilience thinking also promotes relevant transformations of system configurations considered adverse or nonsustainable, and therefore proposes the simultaneous analysis of the adaptive capacity and the transformation of a system. In this context, seven principles have been proposed, which are considered crucial for social-ecological systems to become resilient. These seven principles of resilience thinking are analyzed in terms of the land use planning and land management of the Amazonian biome. To comprehend its main conflicts, challenges, and opportunities, we reveal the key aspects of the historical process of Latin America’s land management and the Amazon basin’s past and current land use changes. Based on this review, the Amazon region shows two concrete challenges for resilience: (1) the natural system’s fragmentation, as a consequence of land use limiting key ecological processes, and (2) the cultural and institutional fragmentation of land use projects designed and partially implemented in the region. In addition, the region presents challenges related to institutional design, the expansion and strengthening of real participation spaces, and the promotion of social learning. Finally, polycentric and adaptive governance is itself a major, urgent need for this region and its social-ecological complexity. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/184941 Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.; Mazzeo, Nestor; Díaz, Ismael; Barral, María Paula; Piñeiro, Gervasio; et al.; Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 25; 1; 3-2020; 1-18 1708-3087 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/184941 |
identifier_str_mv |
Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar A.; Mazzeo, Nestor; Díaz, Ismael; Barral, María Paula; Piñeiro, Gervasio; et al.; Land use planning in the Amazon basin: Challenges from resilience thinking; Resilience Alliance; Ecology and Society; 25; 1; 3-2020; 1-18 1708-3087 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss1/art8/ info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5751/ES-11352-250108 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Resilience Alliance |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Resilience Alliance |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613770994778112 |
score |
13.070432 |