Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens
- Autores
- Maestro, Beatríz; Ortíz, Juan Manuel; Schrott, Germán David; Busalmen, Juan Pablo; Climent, Victor; Feliu, Juan Miguel
- Año de publicación
- 2014
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- We have investigated the influence of electrode material and crystallographic structure on electron transfer and biofilm formation of Geobacter sulfurreducens. Single-crystal gold—Au(110), Au(111), Au(210)—and platinum—Pt(100), Pt(110), Pt(111), Pt(210)—electrodes were tested and compared to graphite rods. G. sulfurreducens electrochemically interacts with all these materials with different attachment kinetics and final current production, although redox species involved in the electron transfer to the anode are virtually the same in all cases. Initial bacterial colonization was fastest on graphite up to the monolayer level, whereas gold electrodes led to higher final current densities. Crystal geometry was shown to have an important influence, with Au(210) sustaining a current density of up to 1442 ± 101 μA cm− 2 at the steady state, over Au(111) with 961 ± 94 μA cm− 2 and Au(110) with 944 ± 89 μA cm− 2. On the other hand, the platinum electrodes displayed the lowest performances, including Pt(210). Our results indicate that both crystal geometry and electrode material are key parameters for the efficient interaction of bacteria with the substrate and should be considered for the design of novel materials and microbial devices to optimize energy production.
Fil: Maestro, Beatríz. Instituto Universitario de Electroquímica. Universidad de Alicant; España
Fil: Ortíz, Juan Manuel. Instituto Universitario de Electroquímica. Universidad de Alicant; España
Fil: Schrott, Germán David. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales (i); Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina
Fil: Busalmen, Juan Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales (i); Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina
Fil: Climent, Victor. Instituto Universitario de Electroquímica. Universidad de Alicant; España
Fil: Feliu, Juan Miguel. Instituto Universitario de Electroquímica. Universidad de Alicant; España - Materia
-
Geobacter
Biofilms
Single-Crystal Electrode
Electron Transport
Cytochrome - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/5360
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_1b9b0e54d3be580384f538ba2c6d74ab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/5360 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducensMaestro, BeatrízOrtíz, Juan ManuelSchrott, Germán DavidBusalmen, Juan PabloCliment, VictorFeliu, Juan MiguelGeobacterBiofilmsSingle-Crystal ElectrodeElectron TransportCytochromehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1We have investigated the influence of electrode material and crystallographic structure on electron transfer and biofilm formation of Geobacter sulfurreducens. Single-crystal gold—Au(110), Au(111), Au(210)—and platinum—Pt(100), Pt(110), Pt(111), Pt(210)—electrodes were tested and compared to graphite rods. G. sulfurreducens electrochemically interacts with all these materials with different attachment kinetics and final current production, although redox species involved in the electron transfer to the anode are virtually the same in all cases. Initial bacterial colonization was fastest on graphite up to the monolayer level, whereas gold electrodes led to higher final current densities. Crystal geometry was shown to have an important influence, with Au(210) sustaining a current density of up to 1442 ± 101 μA cm− 2 at the steady state, over Au(111) with 961 ± 94 μA cm− 2 and Au(110) with 944 ± 89 μA cm− 2. On the other hand, the platinum electrodes displayed the lowest performances, including Pt(210). Our results indicate that both crystal geometry and electrode material are key parameters for the efficient interaction of bacteria with the substrate and should be considered for the design of novel materials and microbial devices to optimize energy production.Fil: Maestro, Beatríz. Instituto Universitario de Electroquímica. Universidad de Alicant; EspañaFil: Ortíz, Juan Manuel. Instituto Universitario de Electroquímica. Universidad de Alicant; EspañaFil: Schrott, Germán David. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales (i); Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería; ArgentinaFil: Busalmen, Juan Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales (i); Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería; ArgentinaFil: Climent, Victor. Instituto Universitario de Electroquímica. Universidad de Alicant; EspañaFil: Feliu, Juan Miguel. Instituto Universitario de Electroquímica. Universidad de Alicant; EspañaElsevier2014-02-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/5360Maestro, Beatríz; Ortíz, Juan Manuel; Schrott, Germán David; Busalmen, Juan Pablo; Climent, Victor; et al.; Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens; Elsevier; Bioelectrochemistry; 98; 25-2-2014; 11-191567-5394enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1567-5394info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567539414000358info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.02.001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:45:28Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/5360instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:45:29.243CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens |
title |
Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens |
spellingShingle |
Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens Maestro, Beatríz Geobacter Biofilms Single-Crystal Electrode Electron Transport Cytochrome |
title_short |
Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens |
title_full |
Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens |
title_fullStr |
Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens |
title_full_unstemmed |
Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens |
title_sort |
Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Maestro, Beatríz Ortíz, Juan Manuel Schrott, Germán David Busalmen, Juan Pablo Climent, Victor Feliu, Juan Miguel |
author |
Maestro, Beatríz |
author_facet |
Maestro, Beatríz Ortíz, Juan Manuel Schrott, Germán David Busalmen, Juan Pablo Climent, Victor Feliu, Juan Miguel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ortíz, Juan Manuel Schrott, Germán David Busalmen, Juan Pablo Climent, Victor Feliu, Juan Miguel |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Geobacter Biofilms Single-Crystal Electrode Electron Transport Cytochrome |
topic |
Geobacter Biofilms Single-Crystal Electrode Electron Transport Cytochrome |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
We have investigated the influence of electrode material and crystallographic structure on electron transfer and biofilm formation of Geobacter sulfurreducens. Single-crystal gold—Au(110), Au(111), Au(210)—and platinum—Pt(100), Pt(110), Pt(111), Pt(210)—electrodes were tested and compared to graphite rods. G. sulfurreducens electrochemically interacts with all these materials with different attachment kinetics and final current production, although redox species involved in the electron transfer to the anode are virtually the same in all cases. Initial bacterial colonization was fastest on graphite up to the monolayer level, whereas gold electrodes led to higher final current densities. Crystal geometry was shown to have an important influence, with Au(210) sustaining a current density of up to 1442 ± 101 μA cm− 2 at the steady state, over Au(111) with 961 ± 94 μA cm− 2 and Au(110) with 944 ± 89 μA cm− 2. On the other hand, the platinum electrodes displayed the lowest performances, including Pt(210). Our results indicate that both crystal geometry and electrode material are key parameters for the efficient interaction of bacteria with the substrate and should be considered for the design of novel materials and microbial devices to optimize energy production. Fil: Maestro, Beatríz. Instituto Universitario de Electroquímica. Universidad de Alicant; España Fil: Ortíz, Juan Manuel. Instituto Universitario de Electroquímica. Universidad de Alicant; España Fil: Schrott, Germán David. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales (i); Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina Fil: Busalmen, Juan Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Mar del Plata. Instituto de Investigación en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales (i); Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ingeniería; Argentina Fil: Climent, Victor. Instituto Universitario de Electroquímica. Universidad de Alicant; España Fil: Feliu, Juan Miguel. Instituto Universitario de Electroquímica. Universidad de Alicant; España |
description |
We have investigated the influence of electrode material and crystallographic structure on electron transfer and biofilm formation of Geobacter sulfurreducens. Single-crystal gold—Au(110), Au(111), Au(210)—and platinum—Pt(100), Pt(110), Pt(111), Pt(210)—electrodes were tested and compared to graphite rods. G. sulfurreducens electrochemically interacts with all these materials with different attachment kinetics and final current production, although redox species involved in the electron transfer to the anode are virtually the same in all cases. Initial bacterial colonization was fastest on graphite up to the monolayer level, whereas gold electrodes led to higher final current densities. Crystal geometry was shown to have an important influence, with Au(210) sustaining a current density of up to 1442 ± 101 μA cm− 2 at the steady state, over Au(111) with 961 ± 94 μA cm− 2 and Au(110) with 944 ± 89 μA cm− 2. On the other hand, the platinum electrodes displayed the lowest performances, including Pt(210). Our results indicate that both crystal geometry and electrode material are key parameters for the efficient interaction of bacteria with the substrate and should be considered for the design of novel materials and microbial devices to optimize energy production. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-02-25 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/5360 Maestro, Beatríz; Ortíz, Juan Manuel; Schrott, Germán David; Busalmen, Juan Pablo; Climent, Victor; et al.; Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens; Elsevier; Bioelectrochemistry; 98; 25-2-2014; 11-19 1567-5394 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/5360 |
identifier_str_mv |
Maestro, Beatríz; Ortíz, Juan Manuel; Schrott, Germán David; Busalmen, Juan Pablo; Climent, Victor; et al.; Crystallographic orientation and electrode nature are key factors for electric current generation by Geobacter sulfurreducens; Elsevier; Bioelectrochemistry; 98; 25-2-2014; 11-19 1567-5394 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/ info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1567-5394 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567539414000358 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.02.001 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842268734491721728 |
score |
13.13397 |