Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science

Autores
Graham, Emily B.; Averill, Colin; Bond-Lamberty, Ben; Knelman, Joseph; Krause, Stefan; Peralta, Ariane L.; Shade, Ashley; Smith, Peyton A.; Chen, Susan J.; Fanin, Nicolas; Freund, Cathryn; Garcia, Patricia Elizabeth; Gibbons, Sean M.; Van Goethem, Marc W.; Guebila, Marouen B.; Kemppinen, Julia; Nowicki, Robert J.; Pausas, Juli G.; Reed, Samuel P.; Rocca, Jennifer; Sengupta, Aditi; Sihi, Debjani; Simonin, Marie; Slowinski, Michal; Spawn, Seth A.; Sutherland, Ira; Tonkin, Jonathan D.; Wisnoski, Nathan I.; Zipper, Samuel C.
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Disturbances fundamentally alter ecosystem functions, yet predicting their impacts remains a key scientific challenge. While the study of disturbances is ubiquitous across many ecological disciplines, there is no agreed-upon, cross-disciplinary foundation for discussing or quantifying the complexity of disturbances, and no consistent terminology or methodologies exist. This inconsistency presents an increasingly urgent challenge due to accelerating global change and the threat of interacting disturbances that can destabilize ecosystem responses. By harvesting the expertise of an interdisciplinary cohort of contributors spanning 42 institutions across 15 countries, we identified an essential limitation in disturbance ecology: the word ‘disturbance’ is used interchangeably to refer to both the events that cause, and the consequences of, ecological change, despite fundamental distinctions between the two meanings. In response, we developed a generalizable framework of ecosystem disturbances, providing a well-defined lexicon for understanding disturbances across perspectives and scales. The framework results from ideas that resonate across multiple scientific disciplines and provides a baseline standard to compare disturbances across fields. This framework can be supplemented by discipline-specific variables to provide maximum benefit to both inter- and intra-disciplinary research. To support future syntheses and meta-analyses of disturbance research, we also encourage researchers to be explicit in how they define disturbance drivers and impacts, and we recommend minimum reporting standards that are applicable regardless of scale. Finally, we discuss the primary factors we considered when developing a baseline framework and propose four future directions to advance our interdisciplinary understanding of disturbances and their social-ecological impacts: integrating across ecological scales, understanding disturbance interactions, establishing baselines and trajectories, and developing process-based models and ecological forecasting initiatives. Our experience through this process motivates us to encourage the wider scientific community to continue to explore new approaches for leveraging Open Science principles in generating creative and multidisciplinary ideas.
Fil: Graham, Emily B.. United States Department of Energy; Estados Unidos
Fil: Averill, Colin. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule zurich (eth Zurich);
Fil: Bond-Lamberty, Ben. United States Department of Energy; Estados Unidos
Fil: Knelman, Joseph. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos
Fil: Krause, Stefan. University Of Birmingham; Reino Unido
Fil: Peralta, Ariane L.. East Carolina University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Shade, Ashley. Michigan State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Smith, Peyton A.. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Chen, Susan J.. University of Michigan; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fanin, Nicolas. Bordeaux Sciences Agro; Francia
Fil: Freund, Cathryn. University Wake Forest; Estados Unidos
Fil: Garcia, Patricia Elizabeth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Gibbons, Sean M.. Institute For Systems Biology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Van Goethem, Marc W.. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Estados Unidos
Fil: Guebila, Marouen B.. Harvard University. Harvard School of Public Health; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kemppinen, Julia. University of Helsinki; Finlandia
Fil: Nowicki, Robert J.. Mote Marine Laboratory And Aquarium; Estados Unidos
Fil: Pausas, Juli G.. Centro de Investigación; España
Fil: Reed, Samuel P.. University of Minnesota; Estados Unidos
Fil: Rocca, Jennifer. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: Sengupta, Aditi. United States Department of Energy; Estados Unidos
Fil: Sihi, Debjani. University of Emory; Estados Unidos
Fil: Simonin, Marie. Institut Agro; Francia
Fil: Slowinski, Michal. Institute Of Geography And Spatial Organization Polish; Polonia
Fil: Spawn, Seth A.. University of Wisconsin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Sutherland, Ira. University of British Columbia; Canadá
Fil: Tonkin, Jonathan D.. University of Canterbury; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Wisnoski, Nathan I.. Indiana University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Zipper, Samuel C.. University of Kansas; Estados Unidos
Materia
COMPOUNDING DISTURBANCES
ECOSYSTEM STABILITY
INTERACTING DISTURBANCES
PERTURBATION
RESILIENCE
RESISTANCE
SPATIAL
TEMPORAL
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/184056

id CONICETDig_1ae185a80f4c10ddf141697910eabff9
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/184056
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced ScienceGraham, Emily B.Averill, ColinBond-Lamberty, BenKnelman, JosephKrause, StefanPeralta, Ariane L.Shade, AshleySmith, Peyton A.Chen, Susan J.Fanin, NicolasFreund, CathrynGarcia, Patricia ElizabethGibbons, Sean M.Van Goethem, Marc W.Guebila, Marouen B.Kemppinen, JuliaNowicki, Robert J.Pausas, Juli G.Reed, Samuel P.Rocca, JenniferSengupta, AditiSihi, DebjaniSimonin, MarieSlowinski, MichalSpawn, Seth A.Sutherland, IraTonkin, Jonathan D.Wisnoski, Nathan I.Zipper, Samuel C.COMPOUNDING DISTURBANCESECOSYSTEM STABILITYINTERACTING DISTURBANCESPERTURBATIONRESILIENCERESISTANCESPATIALTEMPORALhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Disturbances fundamentally alter ecosystem functions, yet predicting their impacts remains a key scientific challenge. While the study of disturbances is ubiquitous across many ecological disciplines, there is no agreed-upon, cross-disciplinary foundation for discussing or quantifying the complexity of disturbances, and no consistent terminology or methodologies exist. This inconsistency presents an increasingly urgent challenge due to accelerating global change and the threat of interacting disturbances that can destabilize ecosystem responses. By harvesting the expertise of an interdisciplinary cohort of contributors spanning 42 institutions across 15 countries, we identified an essential limitation in disturbance ecology: the word ‘disturbance’ is used interchangeably to refer to both the events that cause, and the consequences of, ecological change, despite fundamental distinctions between the two meanings. In response, we developed a generalizable framework of ecosystem disturbances, providing a well-defined lexicon for understanding disturbances across perspectives and scales. The framework results from ideas that resonate across multiple scientific disciplines and provides a baseline standard to compare disturbances across fields. This framework can be supplemented by discipline-specific variables to provide maximum benefit to both inter- and intra-disciplinary research. To support future syntheses and meta-analyses of disturbance research, we also encourage researchers to be explicit in how they define disturbance drivers and impacts, and we recommend minimum reporting standards that are applicable regardless of scale. Finally, we discuss the primary factors we considered when developing a baseline framework and propose four future directions to advance our interdisciplinary understanding of disturbances and their social-ecological impacts: integrating across ecological scales, understanding disturbance interactions, establishing baselines and trajectories, and developing process-based models and ecological forecasting initiatives. Our experience through this process motivates us to encourage the wider scientific community to continue to explore new approaches for leveraging Open Science principles in generating creative and multidisciplinary ideas.Fil: Graham, Emily B.. United States Department of Energy; Estados UnidosFil: Averill, Colin. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule zurich (eth Zurich);Fil: Bond-Lamberty, Ben. United States Department of Energy; Estados UnidosFil: Knelman, Joseph. University of Colorado; Estados UnidosFil: Krause, Stefan. University Of Birmingham; Reino UnidoFil: Peralta, Ariane L.. East Carolina University; Estados UnidosFil: Shade, Ashley. Michigan State University; Estados UnidosFil: Smith, Peyton A.. Texas A&M University; Estados UnidosFil: Chen, Susan J.. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Fanin, Nicolas. Bordeaux Sciences Agro; FranciaFil: Freund, Cathryn. University Wake Forest; Estados UnidosFil: Garcia, Patricia Elizabeth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; ArgentinaFil: Gibbons, Sean M.. Institute For Systems Biology; Estados UnidosFil: Van Goethem, Marc W.. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Estados UnidosFil: Guebila, Marouen B.. Harvard University. Harvard School of Public Health; Estados UnidosFil: Kemppinen, Julia. University of Helsinki; FinlandiaFil: Nowicki, Robert J.. Mote Marine Laboratory And Aquarium; Estados UnidosFil: Pausas, Juli G.. Centro de Investigación; EspañaFil: Reed, Samuel P.. University of Minnesota; Estados UnidosFil: Rocca, Jennifer. University of Duke; Estados UnidosFil: Sengupta, Aditi. United States Department of Energy; Estados UnidosFil: Sihi, Debjani. University of Emory; Estados UnidosFil: Simonin, Marie. Institut Agro; FranciaFil: Slowinski, Michal. Institute Of Geography And Spatial Organization Polish; PoloniaFil: Spawn, Seth A.. University of Wisconsin; Estados UnidosFil: Sutherland, Ira. University of British Columbia; CanadáFil: Tonkin, Jonathan D.. University of Canterbury; Nueva ZelandaFil: Wisnoski, Nathan I.. Indiana University; Estados UnidosFil: Zipper, Samuel C.. University of Kansas; Estados UnidosFrontiers Media2021-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/184056Graham, Emily B.; Averill, Colin; Bond-Lamberty, Ben; Knelman, Joseph; Krause, Stefan; et al.; Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution; 9; 5889; 3-2021; 1-142296-701XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.588940/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/ 10.3389/fevo.2021.588940info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:22:36Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/184056instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:22:37.165CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science
title Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science
spellingShingle Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science
Graham, Emily B.
COMPOUNDING DISTURBANCES
ECOSYSTEM STABILITY
INTERACTING DISTURBANCES
PERTURBATION
RESILIENCE
RESISTANCE
SPATIAL
TEMPORAL
title_short Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science
title_full Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science
title_fullStr Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science
title_full_unstemmed Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science
title_sort Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Graham, Emily B.
Averill, Colin
Bond-Lamberty, Ben
Knelman, Joseph
Krause, Stefan
Peralta, Ariane L.
Shade, Ashley
Smith, Peyton A.
Chen, Susan J.
Fanin, Nicolas
Freund, Cathryn
Garcia, Patricia Elizabeth
Gibbons, Sean M.
Van Goethem, Marc W.
Guebila, Marouen B.
Kemppinen, Julia
Nowicki, Robert J.
Pausas, Juli G.
Reed, Samuel P.
Rocca, Jennifer
Sengupta, Aditi
Sihi, Debjani
Simonin, Marie
Slowinski, Michal
Spawn, Seth A.
Sutherland, Ira
Tonkin, Jonathan D.
Wisnoski, Nathan I.
Zipper, Samuel C.
author Graham, Emily B.
author_facet Graham, Emily B.
Averill, Colin
Bond-Lamberty, Ben
Knelman, Joseph
Krause, Stefan
Peralta, Ariane L.
Shade, Ashley
Smith, Peyton A.
Chen, Susan J.
Fanin, Nicolas
Freund, Cathryn
Garcia, Patricia Elizabeth
Gibbons, Sean M.
Van Goethem, Marc W.
Guebila, Marouen B.
Kemppinen, Julia
Nowicki, Robert J.
Pausas, Juli G.
Reed, Samuel P.
Rocca, Jennifer
Sengupta, Aditi
Sihi, Debjani
Simonin, Marie
Slowinski, Michal
Spawn, Seth A.
Sutherland, Ira
Tonkin, Jonathan D.
Wisnoski, Nathan I.
Zipper, Samuel C.
author_role author
author2 Averill, Colin
Bond-Lamberty, Ben
Knelman, Joseph
Krause, Stefan
Peralta, Ariane L.
Shade, Ashley
Smith, Peyton A.
Chen, Susan J.
Fanin, Nicolas
Freund, Cathryn
Garcia, Patricia Elizabeth
Gibbons, Sean M.
Van Goethem, Marc W.
Guebila, Marouen B.
Kemppinen, Julia
Nowicki, Robert J.
Pausas, Juli G.
Reed, Samuel P.
Rocca, Jennifer
Sengupta, Aditi
Sihi, Debjani
Simonin, Marie
Slowinski, Michal
Spawn, Seth A.
Sutherland, Ira
Tonkin, Jonathan D.
Wisnoski, Nathan I.
Zipper, Samuel C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv COMPOUNDING DISTURBANCES
ECOSYSTEM STABILITY
INTERACTING DISTURBANCES
PERTURBATION
RESILIENCE
RESISTANCE
SPATIAL
TEMPORAL
topic COMPOUNDING DISTURBANCES
ECOSYSTEM STABILITY
INTERACTING DISTURBANCES
PERTURBATION
RESILIENCE
RESISTANCE
SPATIAL
TEMPORAL
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Disturbances fundamentally alter ecosystem functions, yet predicting their impacts remains a key scientific challenge. While the study of disturbances is ubiquitous across many ecological disciplines, there is no agreed-upon, cross-disciplinary foundation for discussing or quantifying the complexity of disturbances, and no consistent terminology or methodologies exist. This inconsistency presents an increasingly urgent challenge due to accelerating global change and the threat of interacting disturbances that can destabilize ecosystem responses. By harvesting the expertise of an interdisciplinary cohort of contributors spanning 42 institutions across 15 countries, we identified an essential limitation in disturbance ecology: the word ‘disturbance’ is used interchangeably to refer to both the events that cause, and the consequences of, ecological change, despite fundamental distinctions between the two meanings. In response, we developed a generalizable framework of ecosystem disturbances, providing a well-defined lexicon for understanding disturbances across perspectives and scales. The framework results from ideas that resonate across multiple scientific disciplines and provides a baseline standard to compare disturbances across fields. This framework can be supplemented by discipline-specific variables to provide maximum benefit to both inter- and intra-disciplinary research. To support future syntheses and meta-analyses of disturbance research, we also encourage researchers to be explicit in how they define disturbance drivers and impacts, and we recommend minimum reporting standards that are applicable regardless of scale. Finally, we discuss the primary factors we considered when developing a baseline framework and propose four future directions to advance our interdisciplinary understanding of disturbances and their social-ecological impacts: integrating across ecological scales, understanding disturbance interactions, establishing baselines and trajectories, and developing process-based models and ecological forecasting initiatives. Our experience through this process motivates us to encourage the wider scientific community to continue to explore new approaches for leveraging Open Science principles in generating creative and multidisciplinary ideas.
Fil: Graham, Emily B.. United States Department of Energy; Estados Unidos
Fil: Averill, Colin. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule zurich (eth Zurich);
Fil: Bond-Lamberty, Ben. United States Department of Energy; Estados Unidos
Fil: Knelman, Joseph. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos
Fil: Krause, Stefan. University Of Birmingham; Reino Unido
Fil: Peralta, Ariane L.. East Carolina University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Shade, Ashley. Michigan State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Smith, Peyton A.. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Chen, Susan J.. University of Michigan; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fanin, Nicolas. Bordeaux Sciences Agro; Francia
Fil: Freund, Cathryn. University Wake Forest; Estados Unidos
Fil: Garcia, Patricia Elizabeth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Gibbons, Sean M.. Institute For Systems Biology; Estados Unidos
Fil: Van Goethem, Marc W.. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Estados Unidos
Fil: Guebila, Marouen B.. Harvard University. Harvard School of Public Health; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kemppinen, Julia. University of Helsinki; Finlandia
Fil: Nowicki, Robert J.. Mote Marine Laboratory And Aquarium; Estados Unidos
Fil: Pausas, Juli G.. Centro de Investigación; España
Fil: Reed, Samuel P.. University of Minnesota; Estados Unidos
Fil: Rocca, Jennifer. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: Sengupta, Aditi. United States Department of Energy; Estados Unidos
Fil: Sihi, Debjani. University of Emory; Estados Unidos
Fil: Simonin, Marie. Institut Agro; Francia
Fil: Slowinski, Michal. Institute Of Geography And Spatial Organization Polish; Polonia
Fil: Spawn, Seth A.. University of Wisconsin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Sutherland, Ira. University of British Columbia; Canadá
Fil: Tonkin, Jonathan D.. University of Canterbury; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Wisnoski, Nathan I.. Indiana University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Zipper, Samuel C.. University of Kansas; Estados Unidos
description Disturbances fundamentally alter ecosystem functions, yet predicting their impacts remains a key scientific challenge. While the study of disturbances is ubiquitous across many ecological disciplines, there is no agreed-upon, cross-disciplinary foundation for discussing or quantifying the complexity of disturbances, and no consistent terminology or methodologies exist. This inconsistency presents an increasingly urgent challenge due to accelerating global change and the threat of interacting disturbances that can destabilize ecosystem responses. By harvesting the expertise of an interdisciplinary cohort of contributors spanning 42 institutions across 15 countries, we identified an essential limitation in disturbance ecology: the word ‘disturbance’ is used interchangeably to refer to both the events that cause, and the consequences of, ecological change, despite fundamental distinctions between the two meanings. In response, we developed a generalizable framework of ecosystem disturbances, providing a well-defined lexicon for understanding disturbances across perspectives and scales. The framework results from ideas that resonate across multiple scientific disciplines and provides a baseline standard to compare disturbances across fields. This framework can be supplemented by discipline-specific variables to provide maximum benefit to both inter- and intra-disciplinary research. To support future syntheses and meta-analyses of disturbance research, we also encourage researchers to be explicit in how they define disturbance drivers and impacts, and we recommend minimum reporting standards that are applicable regardless of scale. Finally, we discuss the primary factors we considered when developing a baseline framework and propose four future directions to advance our interdisciplinary understanding of disturbances and their social-ecological impacts: integrating across ecological scales, understanding disturbance interactions, establishing baselines and trajectories, and developing process-based models and ecological forecasting initiatives. Our experience through this process motivates us to encourage the wider scientific community to continue to explore new approaches for leveraging Open Science principles in generating creative and multidisciplinary ideas.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/184056
Graham, Emily B.; Averill, Colin; Bond-Lamberty, Ben; Knelman, Joseph; Krause, Stefan; et al.; Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution; 9; 5889; 3-2021; 1-14
2296-701X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/184056
identifier_str_mv Graham, Emily B.; Averill, Colin; Bond-Lamberty, Ben; Knelman, Joseph; Krause, Stefan; et al.; Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution; 9; 5889; 3-2021; 1-14
2296-701X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.588940/full
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/ 10.3389/fevo.2021.588940
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614218123313152
score 13.070432