Using ecological attributes as criteria for the selection of plant species under three restoration scenarios
- Autores
- Graff, Barbara Pamela; McIntyre, Sue
- Año de publicación
- 2014
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- We used a conjoint analysis to reveal the preferences of experts with respect to plant attributes under three different restoration scenarios (high-level conservation, functional native vegetation, perennial native pasture) and to generate prioritized lists for restoration of grassy woodland species. Nineteen experts participated in the conjoint analysis. The sample comprised researchers and practitioners with local knowledge of grassy ecosystems. The survey involved repeated pairwise ranking of the relevance of attributes of seven ecological criteria. The relative weightings of the attributes were then used to generate the 50 top-ranked species for each of the three scenarios. Overall phosphorus tolerance was considered the most important criterion, followed by grazing tolerance. Species favoured for high-level conservation management included nutrient- and grazing-intolerant plants with narrower distributions and some species of threatened status. The two scenarios with histories of fertilization and varying levels of ongoing grazing were most similar in that their lists were dominated by graminoids and did not contain any shrubs or geophytes. The ranking of species provides an initial list that could be tailored to take into account specific site conditions and additional knowledge of species. This approach to the selection of species shows promise as either a repeatable process to select species for particular sites, or to generate a classification of species that could be used generically for a small number of common situations.
Fil: Graff, Barbara Pamela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences; Australia
Fil: McIntyre, Sue. CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences; Australia - Materia
-
1000minds
Conjoint-Analysis
Grassland
Grassy Woodland
Plant Functional Trait - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4243
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_19fab9e7c65a4c709fd3f641389f23f5 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4243 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Using ecological attributes as criteria for the selection of plant species under three restoration scenariosGraff, Barbara PamelaMcIntyre, Sue1000mindsConjoint-AnalysisGrasslandGrassy WoodlandPlant Functional Traithttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1We used a conjoint analysis to reveal the preferences of experts with respect to plant attributes under three different restoration scenarios (high-level conservation, functional native vegetation, perennial native pasture) and to generate prioritized lists for restoration of grassy woodland species. Nineteen experts participated in the conjoint analysis. The sample comprised researchers and practitioners with local knowledge of grassy ecosystems. The survey involved repeated pairwise ranking of the relevance of attributes of seven ecological criteria. The relative weightings of the attributes were then used to generate the 50 top-ranked species for each of the three scenarios. Overall phosphorus tolerance was considered the most important criterion, followed by grazing tolerance. Species favoured for high-level conservation management included nutrient- and grazing-intolerant plants with narrower distributions and some species of threatened status. The two scenarios with histories of fertilization and varying levels of ongoing grazing were most similar in that their lists were dominated by graminoids and did not contain any shrubs or geophytes. The ranking of species provides an initial list that could be tailored to take into account specific site conditions and additional knowledge of species. This approach to the selection of species shows promise as either a repeatable process to select species for particular sites, or to generate a classification of species that could be used generically for a small number of common situations.Fil: Graff, Barbara Pamela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences; AustraliaFil: McIntyre, Sue. CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences; AustraliaWiley2014-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/4243Graff, Barbara Pamela; McIntyre, Sue; Using ecological attributes as criteria for the selection of plant species under three restoration scenarios; Wiley; Austral Ecology; 39; 8; 12-2014; 907-9171442-9985enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.12156/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/DOI:10.1111/aec.12156info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1442-9985info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-02-26T10:05:41Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4243instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-02-26 10:05:41.894CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Using ecological attributes as criteria for the selection of plant species under three restoration scenarios |
| title |
Using ecological attributes as criteria for the selection of plant species under three restoration scenarios |
| spellingShingle |
Using ecological attributes as criteria for the selection of plant species under three restoration scenarios Graff, Barbara Pamela 1000minds Conjoint-Analysis Grassland Grassy Woodland Plant Functional Trait |
| title_short |
Using ecological attributes as criteria for the selection of plant species under three restoration scenarios |
| title_full |
Using ecological attributes as criteria for the selection of plant species under three restoration scenarios |
| title_fullStr |
Using ecological attributes as criteria for the selection of plant species under three restoration scenarios |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Using ecological attributes as criteria for the selection of plant species under three restoration scenarios |
| title_sort |
Using ecological attributes as criteria for the selection of plant species under three restoration scenarios |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Graff, Barbara Pamela McIntyre, Sue |
| author |
Graff, Barbara Pamela |
| author_facet |
Graff, Barbara Pamela McIntyre, Sue |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
McIntyre, Sue |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
1000minds Conjoint-Analysis Grassland Grassy Woodland Plant Functional Trait |
| topic |
1000minds Conjoint-Analysis Grassland Grassy Woodland Plant Functional Trait |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
We used a conjoint analysis to reveal the preferences of experts with respect to plant attributes under three different restoration scenarios (high-level conservation, functional native vegetation, perennial native pasture) and to generate prioritized lists for restoration of grassy woodland species. Nineteen experts participated in the conjoint analysis. The sample comprised researchers and practitioners with local knowledge of grassy ecosystems. The survey involved repeated pairwise ranking of the relevance of attributes of seven ecological criteria. The relative weightings of the attributes were then used to generate the 50 top-ranked species for each of the three scenarios. Overall phosphorus tolerance was considered the most important criterion, followed by grazing tolerance. Species favoured for high-level conservation management included nutrient- and grazing-intolerant plants with narrower distributions and some species of threatened status. The two scenarios with histories of fertilization and varying levels of ongoing grazing were most similar in that their lists were dominated by graminoids and did not contain any shrubs or geophytes. The ranking of species provides an initial list that could be tailored to take into account specific site conditions and additional knowledge of species. This approach to the selection of species shows promise as either a repeatable process to select species for particular sites, or to generate a classification of species that could be used generically for a small number of common situations. Fil: Graff, Barbara Pamela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences; Australia Fil: McIntyre, Sue. CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences; Australia |
| description |
We used a conjoint analysis to reveal the preferences of experts with respect to plant attributes under three different restoration scenarios (high-level conservation, functional native vegetation, perennial native pasture) and to generate prioritized lists for restoration of grassy woodland species. Nineteen experts participated in the conjoint analysis. The sample comprised researchers and practitioners with local knowledge of grassy ecosystems. The survey involved repeated pairwise ranking of the relevance of attributes of seven ecological criteria. The relative weightings of the attributes were then used to generate the 50 top-ranked species for each of the three scenarios. Overall phosphorus tolerance was considered the most important criterion, followed by grazing tolerance. Species favoured for high-level conservation management included nutrient- and grazing-intolerant plants with narrower distributions and some species of threatened status. The two scenarios with histories of fertilization and varying levels of ongoing grazing were most similar in that their lists were dominated by graminoids and did not contain any shrubs or geophytes. The ranking of species provides an initial list that could be tailored to take into account specific site conditions and additional knowledge of species. This approach to the selection of species shows promise as either a repeatable process to select species for particular sites, or to generate a classification of species that could be used generically for a small number of common situations. |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-12 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4243 Graff, Barbara Pamela; McIntyre, Sue; Using ecological attributes as criteria for the selection of plant species under three restoration scenarios; Wiley; Austral Ecology; 39; 8; 12-2014; 907-917 1442-9985 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4243 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Graff, Barbara Pamela; McIntyre, Sue; Using ecological attributes as criteria for the selection of plant species under three restoration scenarios; Wiley; Austral Ecology; 39; 8; 12-2014; 907-917 1442-9985 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.12156/abstract info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/DOI:10.1111/aec.12156 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1442-9985 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1858305183390367744 |
| score |
13.176822 |