Intergroup encounters in pair‐living primates: Comparative analysis and a case study of pair‐living and monogamous owl monkeys ( Aotus azarae ) of Argentina

• Autores: Gussone, Leonie; Garcia de la Chica, Alba Tamara; Fernandez Duque, Eduardo
• Año de publicación: 2023
• Idioma: inglés
• Tipo de recurso: artículo
• Materia: between-group encounter; infanticide avoidance; mate defense; pair living; resource defense
• Institución: Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas

The function of intergroup encounters (IGEs) may differ substantially among species of different group sizes and social organizations. Research in group-living primates has shown that the behavioral responses during IGEs can vary widely from affiliative to neutral or aggressive interactions; still, little is known about IGEs in pair-living taxa. We conducted a systematic literature review to find relevant studies on the functions of IGEs in pair-living nonhuman primates that could inform analyses of IGE data (n = 242 IGEs, 21 groups and 10 solitary individuals, 1997−2020) from wild owl monkeys, a pair-living, monogamous primate with extensive biparental care. We identified 1315 studies published between 1965 and 2021; only 13 of them (n = 10 species) contained raw data on the number of IGEs. Our review of those studies showed that IGEs are common, but highly variable in their nature and characteristics in pair-living primates. To examine the non-mutually exclusive hypotheses of resource-, and mate defense, and infanticide avoidance we analyzed data from the Owl Monkey Project 27-year long database to build first an a priori model set. To incorporate prior knowledge from the literature review, we conducted our analyses as a consecutive series of binomial logistic regressions. All IGEs including all biologically relevant parameters (N = 156) were codified into three different behavioral categories (Reaction, Agonism, and Physical Aggression). The analysis showed that owl monkeys regularly engaged in IGEs, most of which were agonistic. They showed more reaction when infants were present, but reactions were less physically aggressive when infants and pregnant females were involved. Overall, our results lend more support for the infant and mate defense hypotheses than they do for the resource defense one.
Fil: Gussone, Leonie. University of Minnesota; Estados Unidos. Universitat Bonn; Alemania
Fil: Garcia de la Chica, Alba Tamara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Fernandez Duque, Eduardo. University of Yale; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina