Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
- Autores
- Kalimeri, Kyriaki; Beiro, Mariano Gastón; Bonanomi, Andrea; Rosina, Alessandro; Cattuto, Ciro
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Background: Social media in scientific research offers a unique digital observatory of human behaviours and hence great opportunities to conduct research at large scale, answering complex sociodemographic questions. We focus on the identification and assessment of biases in social-media-administered surveys.Objective: This study aims to shed light on population, self-selection, and behavioural biases, empirically comparing the consistency between self-reported information collected traditionally versus social-media-administered questionnaires, including demographic and psychometric attributes.Methods: We engaged a demographically representative cohort of young adults in Italy (approximately 4,000 participants) in taking a traditionally administered online survey and then, after one year, we invited them to use our ad hoc Facebook application (988 accepted) where they filled in part of the initial survey. We assess the statistically significant differences indicating population, self-selection, and behavioural biases due to the different context in which the questionnaire is administered.Results: Our findings suggest that surveys administered on Facebook do not exhibit major biases with respect to traditionally administered surveys in terms of neither demographics nor personality traits. Loyalty, authority, and social binding values were higher in the Facebook platform, probably due to the platform?s intrinsic social character.Conclusions: We conclude that Facebook apps are valid research tools for administering demographic and psychometric surveys, provided that the entailed biases are taken into consideration.Contribution: We contribute to the characterisation of Facebook apps as a valid scientific tool to administer demographic and psychometric surveys, and to the assessment of population, self-selection, and behavioural biases in the collected data.
Fil: Kalimeri, Kyriaki. Institute for Scientific Interchange Foundation; Italia
Fil: Beiro, Mariano Gastón. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long"; Argentina
Fil: Bonanomi, Andrea. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Italia
Fil: Rosina, Alessandro. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Italia
Fil: Cattuto, Ciro. Isi Foundation; Italia - Materia
-
SELF-SELECTION BIAS
SELF-REPORTING BIAS
MORAL FOUNDATIONS
SOCIAL MEDIA - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/152778
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_176fd1a5919777389981a1d43f84296e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/152778 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric informationKalimeri, KyriakiBeiro, Mariano GastónBonanomi, AndreaRosina, AlessandroCattuto, CiroSELF-SELECTION BIASSELF-REPORTING BIASMORAL FOUNDATIONSSOCIAL MEDIAhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Background: Social media in scientific research offers a unique digital observatory of human behaviours and hence great opportunities to conduct research at large scale, answering complex sociodemographic questions. We focus on the identification and assessment of biases in social-media-administered surveys.Objective: This study aims to shed light on population, self-selection, and behavioural biases, empirically comparing the consistency between self-reported information collected traditionally versus social-media-administered questionnaires, including demographic and psychometric attributes.Methods: We engaged a demographically representative cohort of young adults in Italy (approximately 4,000 participants) in taking a traditionally administered online survey and then, after one year, we invited them to use our ad hoc Facebook application (988 accepted) where they filled in part of the initial survey. We assess the statistically significant differences indicating population, self-selection, and behavioural biases due to the different context in which the questionnaire is administered.Results: Our findings suggest that surveys administered on Facebook do not exhibit major biases with respect to traditionally administered surveys in terms of neither demographics nor personality traits. Loyalty, authority, and social binding values were higher in the Facebook platform, probably due to the platform?s intrinsic social character.Conclusions: We conclude that Facebook apps are valid research tools for administering demographic and psychometric surveys, provided that the entailed biases are taken into consideration.Contribution: We contribute to the characterisation of Facebook apps as a valid scientific tool to administer demographic and psychometric surveys, and to the assessment of population, self-selection, and behavioural biases in the collected data.Fil: Kalimeri, Kyriaki. Institute for Scientific Interchange Foundation; ItaliaFil: Beiro, Mariano Gastón. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long"; ArgentinaFil: Bonanomi, Andrea. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; ItaliaFil: Rosina, Alessandro. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; ItaliaFil: Cattuto, Ciro. Isi Foundation; ItaliaMax Planck Society2020-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/152778Kalimeri, Kyriaki; Beiro, Mariano Gastón; Bonanomi, Andrea; Rosina, Alessandro; Cattuto, Ciro; Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information; Max Planck Society; Demographic Research; 42; 1-2020; 133-1481435-9871CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol42/5/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4054/DemRes.2020.42.5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:29:48Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/152778instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:29:48.804CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information |
title |
Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information |
spellingShingle |
Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information Kalimeri, Kyriaki SELF-SELECTION BIAS SELF-REPORTING BIAS MORAL FOUNDATIONS SOCIAL MEDIA |
title_short |
Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information |
title_full |
Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information |
title_fullStr |
Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information |
title_full_unstemmed |
Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information |
title_sort |
Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Kalimeri, Kyriaki Beiro, Mariano Gastón Bonanomi, Andrea Rosina, Alessandro Cattuto, Ciro |
author |
Kalimeri, Kyriaki |
author_facet |
Kalimeri, Kyriaki Beiro, Mariano Gastón Bonanomi, Andrea Rosina, Alessandro Cattuto, Ciro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Beiro, Mariano Gastón Bonanomi, Andrea Rosina, Alessandro Cattuto, Ciro |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
SELF-SELECTION BIAS SELF-REPORTING BIAS MORAL FOUNDATIONS SOCIAL MEDIA |
topic |
SELF-SELECTION BIAS SELF-REPORTING BIAS MORAL FOUNDATIONS SOCIAL MEDIA |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Background: Social media in scientific research offers a unique digital observatory of human behaviours and hence great opportunities to conduct research at large scale, answering complex sociodemographic questions. We focus on the identification and assessment of biases in social-media-administered surveys.Objective: This study aims to shed light on population, self-selection, and behavioural biases, empirically comparing the consistency between self-reported information collected traditionally versus social-media-administered questionnaires, including demographic and psychometric attributes.Methods: We engaged a demographically representative cohort of young adults in Italy (approximately 4,000 participants) in taking a traditionally administered online survey and then, after one year, we invited them to use our ad hoc Facebook application (988 accepted) where they filled in part of the initial survey. We assess the statistically significant differences indicating population, self-selection, and behavioural biases due to the different context in which the questionnaire is administered.Results: Our findings suggest that surveys administered on Facebook do not exhibit major biases with respect to traditionally administered surveys in terms of neither demographics nor personality traits. Loyalty, authority, and social binding values were higher in the Facebook platform, probably due to the platform?s intrinsic social character.Conclusions: We conclude that Facebook apps are valid research tools for administering demographic and psychometric surveys, provided that the entailed biases are taken into consideration.Contribution: We contribute to the characterisation of Facebook apps as a valid scientific tool to administer demographic and psychometric surveys, and to the assessment of population, self-selection, and behavioural biases in the collected data. Fil: Kalimeri, Kyriaki. Institute for Scientific Interchange Foundation; Italia Fil: Beiro, Mariano Gastón. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long"; Argentina Fil: Bonanomi, Andrea. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Italia Fil: Rosina, Alessandro. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Italia Fil: Cattuto, Ciro. Isi Foundation; Italia |
description |
Background: Social media in scientific research offers a unique digital observatory of human behaviours and hence great opportunities to conduct research at large scale, answering complex sociodemographic questions. We focus on the identification and assessment of biases in social-media-administered surveys.Objective: This study aims to shed light on population, self-selection, and behavioural biases, empirically comparing the consistency between self-reported information collected traditionally versus social-media-administered questionnaires, including demographic and psychometric attributes.Methods: We engaged a demographically representative cohort of young adults in Italy (approximately 4,000 participants) in taking a traditionally administered online survey and then, after one year, we invited them to use our ad hoc Facebook application (988 accepted) where they filled in part of the initial survey. We assess the statistically significant differences indicating population, self-selection, and behavioural biases due to the different context in which the questionnaire is administered.Results: Our findings suggest that surveys administered on Facebook do not exhibit major biases with respect to traditionally administered surveys in terms of neither demographics nor personality traits. Loyalty, authority, and social binding values were higher in the Facebook platform, probably due to the platform?s intrinsic social character.Conclusions: We conclude that Facebook apps are valid research tools for administering demographic and psychometric surveys, provided that the entailed biases are taken into consideration.Contribution: We contribute to the characterisation of Facebook apps as a valid scientific tool to administer demographic and psychometric surveys, and to the assessment of population, self-selection, and behavioural biases in the collected data. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/152778 Kalimeri, Kyriaki; Beiro, Mariano Gastón; Bonanomi, Andrea; Rosina, Alessandro; Cattuto, Ciro; Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information; Max Planck Society; Demographic Research; 42; 1-2020; 133-148 1435-9871 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/152778 |
identifier_str_mv |
Kalimeri, Kyriaki; Beiro, Mariano Gastón; Bonanomi, Andrea; Rosina, Alessandro; Cattuto, Ciro; Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information; Max Planck Society; Demographic Research; 42; 1-2020; 133-148 1435-9871 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol42/5/ info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4054/DemRes.2020.42.5 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Max Planck Society |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Max Planck Society |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846082771473137664 |
score |
13.22299 |