Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information

Autores
Kalimeri, Kyriaki; Beiro, Mariano Gastón; Bonanomi, Andrea; Rosina, Alessandro; Cattuto, Ciro
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background: Social media in scientific research offers a unique digital observatory of human behaviours and hence great opportunities to conduct research at large scale, answering complex sociodemographic questions. We focus on the identification and assessment of biases in social-media-administered surveys.Objective: This study aims to shed light on population, self-selection, and behavioural biases, empirically comparing the consistency between self-reported information collected traditionally versus social-media-administered questionnaires, including demographic and psychometric attributes.Methods: We engaged a demographically representative cohort of young adults in Italy (approximately 4,000 participants) in taking a traditionally administered online survey and then, after one year, we invited them to use our ad hoc Facebook application (988 accepted) where they filled in part of the initial survey. We assess the statistically significant differences indicating population, self-selection, and behavioural biases due to the different context in which the questionnaire is administered.Results: Our findings suggest that surveys administered on Facebook do not exhibit major biases with respect to traditionally administered surveys in terms of neither demographics nor personality traits. Loyalty, authority, and social binding values were higher in the Facebook platform, probably due to the platform?s intrinsic social character.Conclusions: We conclude that Facebook apps are valid research tools for administering demographic and psychometric surveys, provided that the entailed biases are taken into consideration.Contribution: We contribute to the characterisation of Facebook apps as a valid scientific tool to administer demographic and psychometric surveys, and to the assessment of population, self-selection, and behavioural biases in the collected data.
Fil: Kalimeri, Kyriaki. Institute for Scientific Interchange Foundation; Italia
Fil: Beiro, Mariano Gastón. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long"; Argentina
Fil: Bonanomi, Andrea. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Italia
Fil: Rosina, Alessandro. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Italia
Fil: Cattuto, Ciro. Isi Foundation; Italia
Materia
SELF-SELECTION BIAS
SELF-REPORTING BIAS
MORAL FOUNDATIONS
SOCIAL MEDIA
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/152778

id CONICETDig_176fd1a5919777389981a1d43f84296e
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/152778
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric informationKalimeri, KyriakiBeiro, Mariano GastónBonanomi, AndreaRosina, AlessandroCattuto, CiroSELF-SELECTION BIASSELF-REPORTING BIASMORAL FOUNDATIONSSOCIAL MEDIAhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Background: Social media in scientific research offers a unique digital observatory of human behaviours and hence great opportunities to conduct research at large scale, answering complex sociodemographic questions. We focus on the identification and assessment of biases in social-media-administered surveys.Objective: This study aims to shed light on population, self-selection, and behavioural biases, empirically comparing the consistency between self-reported information collected traditionally versus social-media-administered questionnaires, including demographic and psychometric attributes.Methods: We engaged a demographically representative cohort of young adults in Italy (approximately 4,000 participants) in taking a traditionally administered online survey and then, after one year, we invited them to use our ad hoc Facebook application (988 accepted) where they filled in part of the initial survey. We assess the statistically significant differences indicating population, self-selection, and behavioural biases due to the different context in which the questionnaire is administered.Results: Our findings suggest that surveys administered on Facebook do not exhibit major biases with respect to traditionally administered surveys in terms of neither demographics nor personality traits. Loyalty, authority, and social binding values were higher in the Facebook platform, probably due to the platform?s intrinsic social character.Conclusions: We conclude that Facebook apps are valid research tools for administering demographic and psychometric surveys, provided that the entailed biases are taken into consideration.Contribution: We contribute to the characterisation of Facebook apps as a valid scientific tool to administer demographic and psychometric surveys, and to the assessment of population, self-selection, and behavioural biases in the collected data.Fil: Kalimeri, Kyriaki. Institute for Scientific Interchange Foundation; ItaliaFil: Beiro, Mariano Gastón. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long"; ArgentinaFil: Bonanomi, Andrea. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; ItaliaFil: Rosina, Alessandro. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; ItaliaFil: Cattuto, Ciro. Isi Foundation; ItaliaMax Planck Society2020-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/152778Kalimeri, Kyriaki; Beiro, Mariano Gastón; Bonanomi, Andrea; Rosina, Alessandro; Cattuto, Ciro; Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information; Max Planck Society; Demographic Research; 42; 1-2020; 133-1481435-9871CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol42/5/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4054/DemRes.2020.42.5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:29:48Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/152778instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:29:48.804CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
title Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
spellingShingle Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
Kalimeri, Kyriaki
SELF-SELECTION BIAS
SELF-REPORTING BIAS
MORAL FOUNDATIONS
SOCIAL MEDIA
title_short Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
title_full Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
title_fullStr Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
title_full_unstemmed Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
title_sort Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Kalimeri, Kyriaki
Beiro, Mariano Gastón
Bonanomi, Andrea
Rosina, Alessandro
Cattuto, Ciro
author Kalimeri, Kyriaki
author_facet Kalimeri, Kyriaki
Beiro, Mariano Gastón
Bonanomi, Andrea
Rosina, Alessandro
Cattuto, Ciro
author_role author
author2 Beiro, Mariano Gastón
Bonanomi, Andrea
Rosina, Alessandro
Cattuto, Ciro
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SELF-SELECTION BIAS
SELF-REPORTING BIAS
MORAL FOUNDATIONS
SOCIAL MEDIA
topic SELF-SELECTION BIAS
SELF-REPORTING BIAS
MORAL FOUNDATIONS
SOCIAL MEDIA
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background: Social media in scientific research offers a unique digital observatory of human behaviours and hence great opportunities to conduct research at large scale, answering complex sociodemographic questions. We focus on the identification and assessment of biases in social-media-administered surveys.Objective: This study aims to shed light on population, self-selection, and behavioural biases, empirically comparing the consistency between self-reported information collected traditionally versus social-media-administered questionnaires, including demographic and psychometric attributes.Methods: We engaged a demographically representative cohort of young adults in Italy (approximately 4,000 participants) in taking a traditionally administered online survey and then, after one year, we invited them to use our ad hoc Facebook application (988 accepted) where they filled in part of the initial survey. We assess the statistically significant differences indicating population, self-selection, and behavioural biases due to the different context in which the questionnaire is administered.Results: Our findings suggest that surveys administered on Facebook do not exhibit major biases with respect to traditionally administered surveys in terms of neither demographics nor personality traits. Loyalty, authority, and social binding values were higher in the Facebook platform, probably due to the platform?s intrinsic social character.Conclusions: We conclude that Facebook apps are valid research tools for administering demographic and psychometric surveys, provided that the entailed biases are taken into consideration.Contribution: We contribute to the characterisation of Facebook apps as a valid scientific tool to administer demographic and psychometric surveys, and to the assessment of population, self-selection, and behavioural biases in the collected data.
Fil: Kalimeri, Kyriaki. Institute for Scientific Interchange Foundation; Italia
Fil: Beiro, Mariano Gastón. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Tecnologías y Ciencias de la Ingeniería "Hilario Fernández Long"; Argentina
Fil: Bonanomi, Andrea. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Italia
Fil: Rosina, Alessandro. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore; Italia
Fil: Cattuto, Ciro. Isi Foundation; Italia
description Background: Social media in scientific research offers a unique digital observatory of human behaviours and hence great opportunities to conduct research at large scale, answering complex sociodemographic questions. We focus on the identification and assessment of biases in social-media-administered surveys.Objective: This study aims to shed light on population, self-selection, and behavioural biases, empirically comparing the consistency between self-reported information collected traditionally versus social-media-administered questionnaires, including demographic and psychometric attributes.Methods: We engaged a demographically representative cohort of young adults in Italy (approximately 4,000 participants) in taking a traditionally administered online survey and then, after one year, we invited them to use our ad hoc Facebook application (988 accepted) where they filled in part of the initial survey. We assess the statistically significant differences indicating population, self-selection, and behavioural biases due to the different context in which the questionnaire is administered.Results: Our findings suggest that surveys administered on Facebook do not exhibit major biases with respect to traditionally administered surveys in terms of neither demographics nor personality traits. Loyalty, authority, and social binding values were higher in the Facebook platform, probably due to the platform?s intrinsic social character.Conclusions: We conclude that Facebook apps are valid research tools for administering demographic and psychometric surveys, provided that the entailed biases are taken into consideration.Contribution: We contribute to the characterisation of Facebook apps as a valid scientific tool to administer demographic and psychometric surveys, and to the assessment of population, self-selection, and behavioural biases in the collected data.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/152778
Kalimeri, Kyriaki; Beiro, Mariano Gastón; Bonanomi, Andrea; Rosina, Alessandro; Cattuto, Ciro; Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information; Max Planck Society; Demographic Research; 42; 1-2020; 133-148
1435-9871
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/152778
identifier_str_mv Kalimeri, Kyriaki; Beiro, Mariano Gastón; Bonanomi, Andrea; Rosina, Alessandro; Cattuto, Ciro; Traditional versus facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information; Max Planck Society; Demographic Research; 42; 1-2020; 133-148
1435-9871
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol42/5/
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4054/DemRes.2020.42.5
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Max Planck Society
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Max Planck Society
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082771473137664
score 13.22299