Impact of the finfish fishery in the South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula region

Autores
Barrera Oro, Esteban
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Besides krill, finfish is at present the only living resource commercially exploited in the Southern Ocean. Following seals and baleen whales prior to the 1970s, demersal fish stocks were depleted off the South Shetland Islands byintensive industrial fishing during the late 1970s to early 1980s, being the notothenioid species Champsocephalus gunnari and Notothenia rossii the main target species and Gobionotothen gibberifrons mainly taken as by-catch. Theimpact of the offshore fishery also reached the juvenile stocks of the last two species in inshore waters. More than three decades after the end of the fishery, the inshore population of N. rossii is still in the process of recovery while that of G. gibberifrons remains in low condition. Not surprinsingly, the stock of Notothenia coriiceps, a species with similar ecological habits nearshore that was not fished commercially, increased. Since 1982, the Antarctic marine resources have been managed by CCAMLR. Presently (2015), the commercial fishery in the Atlantic sector is restricted mainly to the patagonian toothfish Dissostichus eleginoides and in less intensity to C. gunnari, around South Georgia, Shag Rocks, and in small proportion the South Sandwich Islands. The South Orkney Islands and South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula areas have remained closed to any finfishing since 1990. Since then, a high number of nations have entered into the fishery in all circumantarctic areas, mainly attracted by the high commercial value of the two Dissostichus species, the second, the Antarctic toothfish D. mawsoni. The diminution of certain fish populations appears to have affected other components of the food web. The decrease in the abundance in inshore waters of the South Shetland Islands of G. gibberifrons and N. rossii, which were probably two former important fish preys of the Antarctic Shag Phalacrocorax bransfieldensis, may have influenced to some extent a declining trend in the number of breeding pairs observed in the 1990s at two colonies at Nelson Island, in that archipelago. Conversely, in the shallow water communities of the lower Scotia Arc, N. coriiceps is at present by far, in terms of abundance and biomass, the most successful species, and is an important prey of shags.
Fil: Barrera Oro, Esteban. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”; Argentina. Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Comercio Internacional y Culto. Direccion Nacional del Antártico; Argentina
Materia
Fishery depletion
Notothenioidei
Antarctic ecosystem
Inshore fish
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/62763

id CONICETDig_1568c47eaad15e9589c23fca0b4879ba
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/62763
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Impact of the finfish fishery in the South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula regionBarrera Oro, EstebanFishery depletionNotothenioideiAntarctic ecosystemInshore fishhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Besides krill, finfish is at present the only living resource commercially exploited in the Southern Ocean. Following seals and baleen whales prior to the 1970s, demersal fish stocks were depleted off the South Shetland Islands byintensive industrial fishing during the late 1970s to early 1980s, being the notothenioid species Champsocephalus gunnari and Notothenia rossii the main target species and Gobionotothen gibberifrons mainly taken as by-catch. Theimpact of the offshore fishery also reached the juvenile stocks of the last two species in inshore waters. More than three decades after the end of the fishery, the inshore population of N. rossii is still in the process of recovery while that of G. gibberifrons remains in low condition. Not surprinsingly, the stock of Notothenia coriiceps, a species with similar ecological habits nearshore that was not fished commercially, increased. Since 1982, the Antarctic marine resources have been managed by CCAMLR. Presently (2015), the commercial fishery in the Atlantic sector is restricted mainly to the patagonian toothfish Dissostichus eleginoides and in less intensity to C. gunnari, around South Georgia, Shag Rocks, and in small proportion the South Sandwich Islands. The South Orkney Islands and South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula areas have remained closed to any finfishing since 1990. Since then, a high number of nations have entered into the fishery in all circumantarctic areas, mainly attracted by the high commercial value of the two Dissostichus species, the second, the Antarctic toothfish D. mawsoni. The diminution of certain fish populations appears to have affected other components of the food web. The decrease in the abundance in inshore waters of the South Shetland Islands of G. gibberifrons and N. rossii, which were probably two former important fish preys of the Antarctic Shag Phalacrocorax bransfieldensis, may have influenced to some extent a declining trend in the number of breeding pairs observed in the 1990s at two colonies at Nelson Island, in that archipelago. Conversely, in the shallow water communities of the lower Scotia Arc, N. coriiceps is at present by far, in terms of abundance and biomass, the most successful species, and is an important prey of shags.Fil: Barrera Oro, Esteban. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”; Argentina. Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Comercio Internacional y Culto. Direccion Nacional del Antártico; ArgentinaAgenda Antártica2015-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/62763Barrera Oro, Esteban; Impact of the finfish fishery in the South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula region; Agenda Antártica; Journal of Antarctic Affairs; II; 9-2015; 7-192451-7755CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.agendaantartica.org/agendaen/OCT2015JournalAntarcticAffairs.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:05:43Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/62763instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:05:43.988CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impact of the finfish fishery in the South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula region
title Impact of the finfish fishery in the South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula region
spellingShingle Impact of the finfish fishery in the South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula region
Barrera Oro, Esteban
Fishery depletion
Notothenioidei
Antarctic ecosystem
Inshore fish
title_short Impact of the finfish fishery in the South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula region
title_full Impact of the finfish fishery in the South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula region
title_fullStr Impact of the finfish fishery in the South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula region
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the finfish fishery in the South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula region
title_sort Impact of the finfish fishery in the South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula region
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Barrera Oro, Esteban
author Barrera Oro, Esteban
author_facet Barrera Oro, Esteban
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Fishery depletion
Notothenioidei
Antarctic ecosystem
Inshore fish
topic Fishery depletion
Notothenioidei
Antarctic ecosystem
Inshore fish
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Besides krill, finfish is at present the only living resource commercially exploited in the Southern Ocean. Following seals and baleen whales prior to the 1970s, demersal fish stocks were depleted off the South Shetland Islands byintensive industrial fishing during the late 1970s to early 1980s, being the notothenioid species Champsocephalus gunnari and Notothenia rossii the main target species and Gobionotothen gibberifrons mainly taken as by-catch. Theimpact of the offshore fishery also reached the juvenile stocks of the last two species in inshore waters. More than three decades after the end of the fishery, the inshore population of N. rossii is still in the process of recovery while that of G. gibberifrons remains in low condition. Not surprinsingly, the stock of Notothenia coriiceps, a species with similar ecological habits nearshore that was not fished commercially, increased. Since 1982, the Antarctic marine resources have been managed by CCAMLR. Presently (2015), the commercial fishery in the Atlantic sector is restricted mainly to the patagonian toothfish Dissostichus eleginoides and in less intensity to C. gunnari, around South Georgia, Shag Rocks, and in small proportion the South Sandwich Islands. The South Orkney Islands and South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula areas have remained closed to any finfishing since 1990. Since then, a high number of nations have entered into the fishery in all circumantarctic areas, mainly attracted by the high commercial value of the two Dissostichus species, the second, the Antarctic toothfish D. mawsoni. The diminution of certain fish populations appears to have affected other components of the food web. The decrease in the abundance in inshore waters of the South Shetland Islands of G. gibberifrons and N. rossii, which were probably two former important fish preys of the Antarctic Shag Phalacrocorax bransfieldensis, may have influenced to some extent a declining trend in the number of breeding pairs observed in the 1990s at two colonies at Nelson Island, in that archipelago. Conversely, in the shallow water communities of the lower Scotia Arc, N. coriiceps is at present by far, in terms of abundance and biomass, the most successful species, and is an important prey of shags.
Fil: Barrera Oro, Esteban. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”; Argentina. Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Comercio Internacional y Culto. Direccion Nacional del Antártico; Argentina
description Besides krill, finfish is at present the only living resource commercially exploited in the Southern Ocean. Following seals and baleen whales prior to the 1970s, demersal fish stocks were depleted off the South Shetland Islands byintensive industrial fishing during the late 1970s to early 1980s, being the notothenioid species Champsocephalus gunnari and Notothenia rossii the main target species and Gobionotothen gibberifrons mainly taken as by-catch. Theimpact of the offshore fishery also reached the juvenile stocks of the last two species in inshore waters. More than three decades after the end of the fishery, the inshore population of N. rossii is still in the process of recovery while that of G. gibberifrons remains in low condition. Not surprinsingly, the stock of Notothenia coriiceps, a species with similar ecological habits nearshore that was not fished commercially, increased. Since 1982, the Antarctic marine resources have been managed by CCAMLR. Presently (2015), the commercial fishery in the Atlantic sector is restricted mainly to the patagonian toothfish Dissostichus eleginoides and in less intensity to C. gunnari, around South Georgia, Shag Rocks, and in small proportion the South Sandwich Islands. The South Orkney Islands and South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula areas have remained closed to any finfishing since 1990. Since then, a high number of nations have entered into the fishery in all circumantarctic areas, mainly attracted by the high commercial value of the two Dissostichus species, the second, the Antarctic toothfish D. mawsoni. The diminution of certain fish populations appears to have affected other components of the food web. The decrease in the abundance in inshore waters of the South Shetland Islands of G. gibberifrons and N. rossii, which were probably two former important fish preys of the Antarctic Shag Phalacrocorax bransfieldensis, may have influenced to some extent a declining trend in the number of breeding pairs observed in the 1990s at two colonies at Nelson Island, in that archipelago. Conversely, in the shallow water communities of the lower Scotia Arc, N. coriiceps is at present by far, in terms of abundance and biomass, the most successful species, and is an important prey of shags.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/62763
Barrera Oro, Esteban; Impact of the finfish fishery in the South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula region; Agenda Antártica; Journal of Antarctic Affairs; II; 9-2015; 7-19
2451-7755
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/62763
identifier_str_mv Barrera Oro, Esteban; Impact of the finfish fishery in the South Shetland Islands/Antarctic Peninsula region; Agenda Antártica; Journal of Antarctic Affairs; II; 9-2015; 7-19
2451-7755
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.agendaantartica.org/agendaen/OCT2015JournalAntarcticAffairs.pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Agenda Antártica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Agenda Antártica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980219402584064
score 12.993085