Imperio y democracia en el pensamiento político griego

Autores
Olivera, Diego Alexander
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This article aims at offering some arguments to understand the relationship between empire and democracy in Greek political thought. So, first, I will look into the language about power in the political vocabulary, presenting a thesis based upon a thesis by Nicole Loraux. Then, I will examine Aristotle?s The Constitution of Athens and Politics in order to understand how the Stagirite brings the imperial phenomenon into his political philosophy. Lastly, I will draw the following conclusion: even though Greek political thought did not conceive of empire as in contradiction with democracy, used to rule over the city, it placed the exercise of imperial power in a different site in regards to the power exerted in the democratic polis. Therefore, the fact that democracy was imperial did not amount to a paradox because democracy and empire corresponded to dissimilar domains in the power relations among men.
Fil: Olivera, Diego Alexander. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina
Materia
Aristóteles
Atenas
Imperio
Loraux
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96480
Acceder
id CONICETDig_14f3ddf8ca145a9354f2e63d39c54371
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96480
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Imperio y democracia en el pensamiento político griegoOlivera, Diego AlexanderAristótelesAtenasImperioLorauxhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5This article aims at offering some arguments to understand the relationship between empire and democracy in Greek political thought. So, first, I will look into the language about power in the political vocabulary, presenting a thesis based upon a thesis by Nicole Loraux. Then, I will examine Aristotle?s The Constitution of Athens and Politics in order to understand how the Stagirite brings the imperial phenomenon into his political philosophy. Lastly, I will draw the following conclusion: even though Greek political thought did not conceive of empire as in contradiction with democracy, used to rule over the city, it placed the exercise of imperial power in a different site in regards to the power exerted in the democratic polis. Therefore, the fact that democracy was imperial did not amount to a paradox because democracy and empire corresponded to dissimilar domains in the power relations among men.Fil: Olivera, Diego Alexander. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; ArgentinaUniversidad Católica Argentina2018-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/96480Olivera, Diego Alexander; Imperio y democracia en el pensamiento político griego; Universidad Católica Argentina; De Rebus Antiquis; 8; 8; 11-2018; 17-432250-4923CONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://erevistas.uca.edu.ar/index.php/DRAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:35:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/96480instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:35:29.552CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Imperio y democracia en el pensamiento político griego
title Imperio y democracia en el pensamiento político griego
spellingShingle Imperio y democracia en el pensamiento político griego
Olivera, Diego Alexander
Aristóteles
Atenas
Imperio
Loraux
title_short Imperio y democracia en el pensamiento político griego
title_full Imperio y democracia en el pensamiento político griego
title_fullStr Imperio y democracia en el pensamiento político griego
title_full_unstemmed Imperio y democracia en el pensamiento político griego
title_sort Imperio y democracia en el pensamiento político griego
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Olivera, Diego Alexander
author Olivera, Diego Alexander
author_facet Olivera, Diego Alexander
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Aristóteles
Atenas
Imperio
Loraux
topic Aristóteles
Atenas
Imperio
Loraux
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This article aims at offering some arguments to understand the relationship between empire and democracy in Greek political thought. So, first, I will look into the language about power in the political vocabulary, presenting a thesis based upon a thesis by Nicole Loraux. Then, I will examine Aristotle?s The Constitution of Athens and Politics in order to understand how the Stagirite brings the imperial phenomenon into his political philosophy. Lastly, I will draw the following conclusion: even though Greek political thought did not conceive of empire as in contradiction with democracy, used to rule over the city, it placed the exercise of imperial power in a different site in regards to the power exerted in the democratic polis. Therefore, the fact that democracy was imperial did not amount to a paradox because democracy and empire corresponded to dissimilar domains in the power relations among men.
Fil: Olivera, Diego Alexander. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina
description This article aims at offering some arguments to understand the relationship between empire and democracy in Greek political thought. So, first, I will look into the language about power in the political vocabulary, presenting a thesis based upon a thesis by Nicole Loraux. Then, I will examine Aristotle?s The Constitution of Athens and Politics in order to understand how the Stagirite brings the imperial phenomenon into his political philosophy. Lastly, I will draw the following conclusion: even though Greek political thought did not conceive of empire as in contradiction with democracy, used to rule over the city, it placed the exercise of imperial power in a different site in regards to the power exerted in the democratic polis. Therefore, the fact that democracy was imperial did not amount to a paradox because democracy and empire corresponded to dissimilar domains in the power relations among men.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/96480
Olivera, Diego Alexander; Imperio y democracia en el pensamiento político griego; Universidad Católica Argentina; De Rebus Antiquis; 8; 8; 11-2018; 17-43
2250-4923
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/96480
identifier_str_mv Olivera, Diego Alexander; Imperio y democracia en el pensamiento político griego; Universidad Católica Argentina; De Rebus Antiquis; 8; 8; 11-2018; 17-43
2250-4923
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://erevistas.uca.edu.ar/index.php/DRA
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica Argentina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica Argentina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614373407981568
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares