Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions
- Autores
- Vassolo, Roberto Santiago; Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco; Tortorella, Guilherme Luz; Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson; Tlapa, Diego; Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan
- Año de publicación
- 2021
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Background: Alternative approaches to analyzing and evaluating health care investments in state-of-the-art technologies are being increasingly discussed in the literature, especially with the advent of Healthcare 4.0 (H4.0) technologies or eHealth. Such investments generally involve computer hardware and software that deal with the storage, retrieval, sharing, and use of health care information, data, and knowledge for communication and decision-making. Besides, the use of these technologies significantly increases when addressed in bundles. However, a structured and holistic approach to analyzing investments in H4.0 technologies is not available in the literature. Objective: This study aims to analyze previous research related to the evaluation of H4.0 technologies in hospitals and characterize the most common investment approaches used. We propose a framework that organizes the research associated with hospitals' H4.0 technology investment decisions and suggest five main research directions on the topic. Methods: To achieve our goal, we followed the standard procedure for scoping reviews. We performed a search in the Crossref, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases with the keywords investment, health, industry 4.0, investment, health technology assessment, healthcare 4.0, and smart in the title, abstract, and keywords of research papers. We retrieved 5701 publications from all the databases. After removing papers published before 2011 as well as duplicates and performing further screening, we were left with 244 articles, from which 33 were selected after in-depth analysis to compose the final publication portfolio. Results: Our findings show the multidisciplinary nature of the research related to evaluating hospital investments in H4.0 technologies. We found that the most common investment approaches focused on cost analysis, single technology, and single decision-maker involvement, which dominate bundle analysis, H4.0 technology value considerations, and multiple decision-maker involvement. Conclusions: Some of our findings were unexpected, given the interrelated nature of H4.0 technologies and their multidimensional impact. Owing to the absence of a more holistic approach to H4.0 technology investment decisions, we identified five promising research directions for the topic: development of economic valuation methodologies tailored for H4.0 technologies; accounting for technology interrelations in the form of bundles; accounting for uncertainties in the process of evaluating such technologies; integration of administrative, medical, and patient perspectives into the evaluation process; and balancing and handling complexity in the decision-making process.
Fil: Vassolo, Roberto Santiago. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile
Fil: Tortorella, Guilherme Luz. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina. University of Melbourne; Australia. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Brasil
Fil: Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Brasil
Fil: Tlapa, Diego. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California; México
Fil: Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan. University of Liverpool; Reino Unido - Materia
-
DECISION MAKING
DECISION-MAKERS
HEALTH CARE INVESTMENT
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
HEALTHCARE 4.0
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENTS
NEW TECHNOLOGIES
PUBLIC HEALTH
REAL OPTIONS
SCOPING REVIEW
SMART TECHNOLOGY
TECHNOLOGICAL BUNDLES
TECHNOLOGY - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/150184
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_0f88e8ba210ad2ac7a66ecd1f6ef8909 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/150184 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directionsVassolo, Roberto SantiagoMac Cawley, Alejandro FranciscoTortorella, Guilherme LuzFogliatto, Flavio SansonTlapa, DiegoNarayanamurthy, GopalakrishnanDECISION MAKINGDECISION-MAKERSHEALTH CARE INVESTMENTHEALTH TECHNOLOGYHEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTHEALTHCARE 4.0HOSPITALHOSPITAL MANAGEMENTINVESTMENTSNEW TECHNOLOGIESPUBLIC HEALTHREAL OPTIONSSCOPING REVIEWSMART TECHNOLOGYTECHNOLOGICAL BUNDLESTECHNOLOGYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Background: Alternative approaches to analyzing and evaluating health care investments in state-of-the-art technologies are being increasingly discussed in the literature, especially with the advent of Healthcare 4.0 (H4.0) technologies or eHealth. Such investments generally involve computer hardware and software that deal with the storage, retrieval, sharing, and use of health care information, data, and knowledge for communication and decision-making. Besides, the use of these technologies significantly increases when addressed in bundles. However, a structured and holistic approach to analyzing investments in H4.0 technologies is not available in the literature. Objective: This study aims to analyze previous research related to the evaluation of H4.0 technologies in hospitals and characterize the most common investment approaches used. We propose a framework that organizes the research associated with hospitals' H4.0 technology investment decisions and suggest five main research directions on the topic. Methods: To achieve our goal, we followed the standard procedure for scoping reviews. We performed a search in the Crossref, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases with the keywords investment, health, industry 4.0, investment, health technology assessment, healthcare 4.0, and smart in the title, abstract, and keywords of research papers. We retrieved 5701 publications from all the databases. After removing papers published before 2011 as well as duplicates and performing further screening, we were left with 244 articles, from which 33 were selected after in-depth analysis to compose the final publication portfolio. Results: Our findings show the multidisciplinary nature of the research related to evaluating hospital investments in H4.0 technologies. We found that the most common investment approaches focused on cost analysis, single technology, and single decision-maker involvement, which dominate bundle analysis, H4.0 technology value considerations, and multiple decision-maker involvement. Conclusions: Some of our findings were unexpected, given the interrelated nature of H4.0 technologies and their multidimensional impact. Owing to the absence of a more holistic approach to H4.0 technology investment decisions, we identified five promising research directions for the topic: development of economic valuation methodologies tailored for H4.0 technologies; accounting for technology interrelations in the form of bundles; accounting for uncertainties in the process of evaluating such technologies; integration of administrative, medical, and patient perspectives into the evaluation process; and balancing and handling complexity in the decision-making process.Fil: Vassolo, Roberto Santiago. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; ChileFil: Tortorella, Guilherme Luz. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina. University of Melbourne; Australia. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; BrasilFil: Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; BrasilFil: Tlapa, Diego. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California; MéxicoFil: Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan. University of Liverpool; Reino UnidoJournal Medical Internet Research2021-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/150184Vassolo, Roberto Santiago; Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco; Tortorella, Guilherme Luz; Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson; Tlapa, Diego; et al.; Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions; Journal Medical Internet Research; Journal Of Medical Internet Research; 23; 8; 8-2021; 1-221438-88711439-4456CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.jmir.org/2021/8/e27571info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2196/27571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:10:22Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/150184instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:10:22.771CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions |
title |
Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions |
spellingShingle |
Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions Vassolo, Roberto Santiago DECISION MAKING DECISION-MAKERS HEALTH CARE INVESTMENT HEALTH TECHNOLOGY HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT HEALTHCARE 4.0 HOSPITAL HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT INVESTMENTS NEW TECHNOLOGIES PUBLIC HEALTH REAL OPTIONS SCOPING REVIEW SMART TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGICAL BUNDLES TECHNOLOGY |
title_short |
Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions |
title_full |
Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions |
title_fullStr |
Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions |
title_sort |
Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Vassolo, Roberto Santiago Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco Tortorella, Guilherme Luz Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson Tlapa, Diego Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan |
author |
Vassolo, Roberto Santiago |
author_facet |
Vassolo, Roberto Santiago Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco Tortorella, Guilherme Luz Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson Tlapa, Diego Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco Tortorella, Guilherme Luz Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson Tlapa, Diego Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
DECISION MAKING DECISION-MAKERS HEALTH CARE INVESTMENT HEALTH TECHNOLOGY HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT HEALTHCARE 4.0 HOSPITAL HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT INVESTMENTS NEW TECHNOLOGIES PUBLIC HEALTH REAL OPTIONS SCOPING REVIEW SMART TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGICAL BUNDLES TECHNOLOGY |
topic |
DECISION MAKING DECISION-MAKERS HEALTH CARE INVESTMENT HEALTH TECHNOLOGY HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT HEALTHCARE 4.0 HOSPITAL HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT INVESTMENTS NEW TECHNOLOGIES PUBLIC HEALTH REAL OPTIONS SCOPING REVIEW SMART TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGICAL BUNDLES TECHNOLOGY |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Background: Alternative approaches to analyzing and evaluating health care investments in state-of-the-art technologies are being increasingly discussed in the literature, especially with the advent of Healthcare 4.0 (H4.0) technologies or eHealth. Such investments generally involve computer hardware and software that deal with the storage, retrieval, sharing, and use of health care information, data, and knowledge for communication and decision-making. Besides, the use of these technologies significantly increases when addressed in bundles. However, a structured and holistic approach to analyzing investments in H4.0 technologies is not available in the literature. Objective: This study aims to analyze previous research related to the evaluation of H4.0 technologies in hospitals and characterize the most common investment approaches used. We propose a framework that organizes the research associated with hospitals' H4.0 technology investment decisions and suggest five main research directions on the topic. Methods: To achieve our goal, we followed the standard procedure for scoping reviews. We performed a search in the Crossref, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases with the keywords investment, health, industry 4.0, investment, health technology assessment, healthcare 4.0, and smart in the title, abstract, and keywords of research papers. We retrieved 5701 publications from all the databases. After removing papers published before 2011 as well as duplicates and performing further screening, we were left with 244 articles, from which 33 were selected after in-depth analysis to compose the final publication portfolio. Results: Our findings show the multidisciplinary nature of the research related to evaluating hospital investments in H4.0 technologies. We found that the most common investment approaches focused on cost analysis, single technology, and single decision-maker involvement, which dominate bundle analysis, H4.0 technology value considerations, and multiple decision-maker involvement. Conclusions: Some of our findings were unexpected, given the interrelated nature of H4.0 technologies and their multidimensional impact. Owing to the absence of a more holistic approach to H4.0 technology investment decisions, we identified five promising research directions for the topic: development of economic valuation methodologies tailored for H4.0 technologies; accounting for technology interrelations in the form of bundles; accounting for uncertainties in the process of evaluating such technologies; integration of administrative, medical, and patient perspectives into the evaluation process; and balancing and handling complexity in the decision-making process. Fil: Vassolo, Roberto Santiago. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile Fil: Tortorella, Guilherme Luz. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina. University of Melbourne; Australia. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Brasil Fil: Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Brasil Fil: Tlapa, Diego. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California; México Fil: Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan. University of Liverpool; Reino Unido |
description |
Background: Alternative approaches to analyzing and evaluating health care investments in state-of-the-art technologies are being increasingly discussed in the literature, especially with the advent of Healthcare 4.0 (H4.0) technologies or eHealth. Such investments generally involve computer hardware and software that deal with the storage, retrieval, sharing, and use of health care information, data, and knowledge for communication and decision-making. Besides, the use of these technologies significantly increases when addressed in bundles. However, a structured and holistic approach to analyzing investments in H4.0 technologies is not available in the literature. Objective: This study aims to analyze previous research related to the evaluation of H4.0 technologies in hospitals and characterize the most common investment approaches used. We propose a framework that organizes the research associated with hospitals' H4.0 technology investment decisions and suggest five main research directions on the topic. Methods: To achieve our goal, we followed the standard procedure for scoping reviews. We performed a search in the Crossref, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases with the keywords investment, health, industry 4.0, investment, health technology assessment, healthcare 4.0, and smart in the title, abstract, and keywords of research papers. We retrieved 5701 publications from all the databases. After removing papers published before 2011 as well as duplicates and performing further screening, we were left with 244 articles, from which 33 were selected after in-depth analysis to compose the final publication portfolio. Results: Our findings show the multidisciplinary nature of the research related to evaluating hospital investments in H4.0 technologies. We found that the most common investment approaches focused on cost analysis, single technology, and single decision-maker involvement, which dominate bundle analysis, H4.0 technology value considerations, and multiple decision-maker involvement. Conclusions: Some of our findings were unexpected, given the interrelated nature of H4.0 technologies and their multidimensional impact. Owing to the absence of a more holistic approach to H4.0 technology investment decisions, we identified five promising research directions for the topic: development of economic valuation methodologies tailored for H4.0 technologies; accounting for technology interrelations in the form of bundles; accounting for uncertainties in the process of evaluating such technologies; integration of administrative, medical, and patient perspectives into the evaluation process; and balancing and handling complexity in the decision-making process. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/150184 Vassolo, Roberto Santiago; Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco; Tortorella, Guilherme Luz; Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson; Tlapa, Diego; et al.; Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions; Journal Medical Internet Research; Journal Of Medical Internet Research; 23; 8; 8-2021; 1-22 1438-8871 1439-4456 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/150184 |
identifier_str_mv |
Vassolo, Roberto Santiago; Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco; Tortorella, Guilherme Luz; Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson; Tlapa, Diego; et al.; Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions; Journal Medical Internet Research; Journal Of Medical Internet Research; 23; 8; 8-2021; 1-22 1438-8871 1439-4456 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.jmir.org/2021/8/e27571 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2196/27571 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal Medical Internet Research |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal Medical Internet Research |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846083251902349312 |
score |
13.22299 |