Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions

Autores
Vassolo, Roberto Santiago; Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco; Tortorella, Guilherme Luz; Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson; Tlapa, Diego; Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background: Alternative approaches to analyzing and evaluating health care investments in state-of-the-art technologies are being increasingly discussed in the literature, especially with the advent of Healthcare 4.0 (H4.0) technologies or eHealth. Such investments generally involve computer hardware and software that deal with the storage, retrieval, sharing, and use of health care information, data, and knowledge for communication and decision-making. Besides, the use of these technologies significantly increases when addressed in bundles. However, a structured and holistic approach to analyzing investments in H4.0 technologies is not available in the literature. Objective: This study aims to analyze previous research related to the evaluation of H4.0 technologies in hospitals and characterize the most common investment approaches used. We propose a framework that organizes the research associated with hospitals' H4.0 technology investment decisions and suggest five main research directions on the topic. Methods: To achieve our goal, we followed the standard procedure for scoping reviews. We performed a search in the Crossref, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases with the keywords investment, health, industry 4.0, investment, health technology assessment, healthcare 4.0, and smart in the title, abstract, and keywords of research papers. We retrieved 5701 publications from all the databases. After removing papers published before 2011 as well as duplicates and performing further screening, we were left with 244 articles, from which 33 were selected after in-depth analysis to compose the final publication portfolio. Results: Our findings show the multidisciplinary nature of the research related to evaluating hospital investments in H4.0 technologies. We found that the most common investment approaches focused on cost analysis, single technology, and single decision-maker involvement, which dominate bundle analysis, H4.0 technology value considerations, and multiple decision-maker involvement. Conclusions: Some of our findings were unexpected, given the interrelated nature of H4.0 technologies and their multidimensional impact. Owing to the absence of a more holistic approach to H4.0 technology investment decisions, we identified five promising research directions for the topic: development of economic valuation methodologies tailored for H4.0 technologies; accounting for technology interrelations in the form of bundles; accounting for uncertainties in the process of evaluating such technologies; integration of administrative, medical, and patient perspectives into the evaluation process; and balancing and handling complexity in the decision-making process.
Fil: Vassolo, Roberto Santiago. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile
Fil: Tortorella, Guilherme Luz. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina. University of Melbourne; Australia. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Brasil
Fil: Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Brasil
Fil: Tlapa, Diego. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California; México
Fil: Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan. University of Liverpool; Reino Unido
Materia
DECISION MAKING
DECISION-MAKERS
HEALTH CARE INVESTMENT
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
HEALTHCARE 4.0
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENTS
NEW TECHNOLOGIES
PUBLIC HEALTH
REAL OPTIONS
SCOPING REVIEW
SMART TECHNOLOGY
TECHNOLOGICAL BUNDLES
TECHNOLOGY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/150184

id CONICETDig_0f88e8ba210ad2ac7a66ecd1f6ef8909
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/150184
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directionsVassolo, Roberto SantiagoMac Cawley, Alejandro FranciscoTortorella, Guilherme LuzFogliatto, Flavio SansonTlapa, DiegoNarayanamurthy, GopalakrishnanDECISION MAKINGDECISION-MAKERSHEALTH CARE INVESTMENTHEALTH TECHNOLOGYHEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTHEALTHCARE 4.0HOSPITALHOSPITAL MANAGEMENTINVESTMENTSNEW TECHNOLOGIESPUBLIC HEALTHREAL OPTIONSSCOPING REVIEWSMART TECHNOLOGYTECHNOLOGICAL BUNDLESTECHNOLOGYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Background: Alternative approaches to analyzing and evaluating health care investments in state-of-the-art technologies are being increasingly discussed in the literature, especially with the advent of Healthcare 4.0 (H4.0) technologies or eHealth. Such investments generally involve computer hardware and software that deal with the storage, retrieval, sharing, and use of health care information, data, and knowledge for communication and decision-making. Besides, the use of these technologies significantly increases when addressed in bundles. However, a structured and holistic approach to analyzing investments in H4.0 technologies is not available in the literature. Objective: This study aims to analyze previous research related to the evaluation of H4.0 technologies in hospitals and characterize the most common investment approaches used. We propose a framework that organizes the research associated with hospitals' H4.0 technology investment decisions and suggest five main research directions on the topic. Methods: To achieve our goal, we followed the standard procedure for scoping reviews. We performed a search in the Crossref, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases with the keywords investment, health, industry 4.0, investment, health technology assessment, healthcare 4.0, and smart in the title, abstract, and keywords of research papers. We retrieved 5701 publications from all the databases. After removing papers published before 2011 as well as duplicates and performing further screening, we were left with 244 articles, from which 33 were selected after in-depth analysis to compose the final publication portfolio. Results: Our findings show the multidisciplinary nature of the research related to evaluating hospital investments in H4.0 technologies. We found that the most common investment approaches focused on cost analysis, single technology, and single decision-maker involvement, which dominate bundle analysis, H4.0 technology value considerations, and multiple decision-maker involvement. Conclusions: Some of our findings were unexpected, given the interrelated nature of H4.0 technologies and their multidimensional impact. Owing to the absence of a more holistic approach to H4.0 technology investment decisions, we identified five promising research directions for the topic: development of economic valuation methodologies tailored for H4.0 technologies; accounting for technology interrelations in the form of bundles; accounting for uncertainties in the process of evaluating such technologies; integration of administrative, medical, and patient perspectives into the evaluation process; and balancing and handling complexity in the decision-making process.Fil: Vassolo, Roberto Santiago. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; ChileFil: Tortorella, Guilherme Luz. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina. University of Melbourne; Australia. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; BrasilFil: Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; BrasilFil: Tlapa, Diego. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California; MéxicoFil: Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan. University of Liverpool; Reino UnidoJournal Medical Internet Research2021-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/150184Vassolo, Roberto Santiago; Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco; Tortorella, Guilherme Luz; Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson; Tlapa, Diego; et al.; Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions; Journal Medical Internet Research; Journal Of Medical Internet Research; 23; 8; 8-2021; 1-221438-88711439-4456CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.jmir.org/2021/8/e27571info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2196/27571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:10:22Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/150184instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:10:22.771CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions
title Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions
spellingShingle Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions
Vassolo, Roberto Santiago
DECISION MAKING
DECISION-MAKERS
HEALTH CARE INVESTMENT
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
HEALTHCARE 4.0
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENTS
NEW TECHNOLOGIES
PUBLIC HEALTH
REAL OPTIONS
SCOPING REVIEW
SMART TECHNOLOGY
TECHNOLOGICAL BUNDLES
TECHNOLOGY
title_short Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions
title_full Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions
title_fullStr Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions
title_full_unstemmed Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions
title_sort Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vassolo, Roberto Santiago
Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco
Tortorella, Guilherme Luz
Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson
Tlapa, Diego
Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan
author Vassolo, Roberto Santiago
author_facet Vassolo, Roberto Santiago
Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco
Tortorella, Guilherme Luz
Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson
Tlapa, Diego
Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan
author_role author
author2 Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco
Tortorella, Guilherme Luz
Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson
Tlapa, Diego
Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DECISION MAKING
DECISION-MAKERS
HEALTH CARE INVESTMENT
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
HEALTHCARE 4.0
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENTS
NEW TECHNOLOGIES
PUBLIC HEALTH
REAL OPTIONS
SCOPING REVIEW
SMART TECHNOLOGY
TECHNOLOGICAL BUNDLES
TECHNOLOGY
topic DECISION MAKING
DECISION-MAKERS
HEALTH CARE INVESTMENT
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
HEALTHCARE 4.0
HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENTS
NEW TECHNOLOGIES
PUBLIC HEALTH
REAL OPTIONS
SCOPING REVIEW
SMART TECHNOLOGY
TECHNOLOGICAL BUNDLES
TECHNOLOGY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background: Alternative approaches to analyzing and evaluating health care investments in state-of-the-art technologies are being increasingly discussed in the literature, especially with the advent of Healthcare 4.0 (H4.0) technologies or eHealth. Such investments generally involve computer hardware and software that deal with the storage, retrieval, sharing, and use of health care information, data, and knowledge for communication and decision-making. Besides, the use of these technologies significantly increases when addressed in bundles. However, a structured and holistic approach to analyzing investments in H4.0 technologies is not available in the literature. Objective: This study aims to analyze previous research related to the evaluation of H4.0 technologies in hospitals and characterize the most common investment approaches used. We propose a framework that organizes the research associated with hospitals' H4.0 technology investment decisions and suggest five main research directions on the topic. Methods: To achieve our goal, we followed the standard procedure for scoping reviews. We performed a search in the Crossref, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases with the keywords investment, health, industry 4.0, investment, health technology assessment, healthcare 4.0, and smart in the title, abstract, and keywords of research papers. We retrieved 5701 publications from all the databases. After removing papers published before 2011 as well as duplicates and performing further screening, we were left with 244 articles, from which 33 were selected after in-depth analysis to compose the final publication portfolio. Results: Our findings show the multidisciplinary nature of the research related to evaluating hospital investments in H4.0 technologies. We found that the most common investment approaches focused on cost analysis, single technology, and single decision-maker involvement, which dominate bundle analysis, H4.0 technology value considerations, and multiple decision-maker involvement. Conclusions: Some of our findings were unexpected, given the interrelated nature of H4.0 technologies and their multidimensional impact. Owing to the absence of a more holistic approach to H4.0 technology investment decisions, we identified five promising research directions for the topic: development of economic valuation methodologies tailored for H4.0 technologies; accounting for technology interrelations in the form of bundles; accounting for uncertainties in the process of evaluating such technologies; integration of administrative, medical, and patient perspectives into the evaluation process; and balancing and handling complexity in the decision-making process.
Fil: Vassolo, Roberto Santiago. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile
Fil: Tortorella, Guilherme Luz. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina. University of Melbourne; Australia. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Brasil
Fil: Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Brasil
Fil: Tlapa, Diego. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California; México
Fil: Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan. University of Liverpool; Reino Unido
description Background: Alternative approaches to analyzing and evaluating health care investments in state-of-the-art technologies are being increasingly discussed in the literature, especially with the advent of Healthcare 4.0 (H4.0) technologies or eHealth. Such investments generally involve computer hardware and software that deal with the storage, retrieval, sharing, and use of health care information, data, and knowledge for communication and decision-making. Besides, the use of these technologies significantly increases when addressed in bundles. However, a structured and holistic approach to analyzing investments in H4.0 technologies is not available in the literature. Objective: This study aims to analyze previous research related to the evaluation of H4.0 technologies in hospitals and characterize the most common investment approaches used. We propose a framework that organizes the research associated with hospitals' H4.0 technology investment decisions and suggest five main research directions on the topic. Methods: To achieve our goal, we followed the standard procedure for scoping reviews. We performed a search in the Crossref, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases with the keywords investment, health, industry 4.0, investment, health technology assessment, healthcare 4.0, and smart in the title, abstract, and keywords of research papers. We retrieved 5701 publications from all the databases. After removing papers published before 2011 as well as duplicates and performing further screening, we were left with 244 articles, from which 33 were selected after in-depth analysis to compose the final publication portfolio. Results: Our findings show the multidisciplinary nature of the research related to evaluating hospital investments in H4.0 technologies. We found that the most common investment approaches focused on cost analysis, single technology, and single decision-maker involvement, which dominate bundle analysis, H4.0 technology value considerations, and multiple decision-maker involvement. Conclusions: Some of our findings were unexpected, given the interrelated nature of H4.0 technologies and their multidimensional impact. Owing to the absence of a more holistic approach to H4.0 technology investment decisions, we identified five promising research directions for the topic: development of economic valuation methodologies tailored for H4.0 technologies; accounting for technology interrelations in the form of bundles; accounting for uncertainties in the process of evaluating such technologies; integration of administrative, medical, and patient perspectives into the evaluation process; and balancing and handling complexity in the decision-making process.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/150184
Vassolo, Roberto Santiago; Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco; Tortorella, Guilherme Luz; Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson; Tlapa, Diego; et al.; Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions; Journal Medical Internet Research; Journal Of Medical Internet Research; 23; 8; 8-2021; 1-22
1438-8871
1439-4456
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/150184
identifier_str_mv Vassolo, Roberto Santiago; Mac Cawley, Alejandro Francisco; Tortorella, Guilherme Luz; Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson; Tlapa, Diego; et al.; Hospital investment decisions in healthcare 4.0 technologies: Scoping review and framework for exploring challenges, trends, and research directions; Journal Medical Internet Research; Journal Of Medical Internet Research; 23; 8; 8-2021; 1-22
1438-8871
1439-4456
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.jmir.org/2021/8/e27571
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2196/27571
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal Medical Internet Research
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal Medical Internet Research
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083251902349312
score 13.22299