Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective
- Autores
- Fluck, Werner Thomas; Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.
- Año de publicación
- 2006
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Effects of herbicide use on forest biodiversity was the topic of a special section in the winter 2004 issue of The Wildlife Society Bulletin. In acknowledging public concerns regarding the toxic effects of herbicides, several of the contributing authors argued that these effects are negligible and that intensifying wood production would be beneficial for forest biodiversity and conservation by reducing habitat conversions. We contend there are other important environmental consequences; hence, responding to increased opportunities for selling wood products by augmenting supply through intensifying production should not be the only option. We argue that it is also important to develop mechanisms to reduce the demand for forest products. We believe the focus of the special section was too narrow, particularly with respect to benefiting biodiversity, because herbicide use also intensifies the export of wood products and, thus, nutrients. Other factors that must be considered include soil acidification caused by biomass export and fertilizer application, as well as additional acidification resulting from aerial emissions. In addition, because of mineral cycle dynamics constraints, intensively managed forests may not be sustainable for wood production, and less so for forest-dependent animals. Extensively exploited forests may deplete mineral reserves, and any intensification likely would speed up the declines. We believe the indirect impact from herbicides through accelerating mineral export and loss needs to be addressed, in particular how it may affect mammals’ ability to accumulate essential trace elements. We contend using fertilizer applications as a corrective measure at the landscape level would be cost-prohibitive. Thus, heralding that herbicides, a tool to intensify wood production, benefit forest biodiversity appears premature, given the time scale of forest growth and soil development.
Fil: Fluck, Werner Thomas. Swiss Tropical Institute; Suiza. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.. Fundación Arelauquen; Argentina - Materia
-
wildlife
trace mineral
biomass export
biogeochemical cycle - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/273999
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_0cdc6ca29bfedffcdd05de911b4b6b10 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/273999 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspectiveFluck, Werner ThomasSmith Flueck, Jo Anne M.wildlifetrace mineralbiomass exportbiogeochemical cyclehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Effects of herbicide use on forest biodiversity was the topic of a special section in the winter 2004 issue of The Wildlife Society Bulletin. In acknowledging public concerns regarding the toxic effects of herbicides, several of the contributing authors argued that these effects are negligible and that intensifying wood production would be beneficial for forest biodiversity and conservation by reducing habitat conversions. We contend there are other important environmental consequences; hence, responding to increased opportunities for selling wood products by augmenting supply through intensifying production should not be the only option. We argue that it is also important to develop mechanisms to reduce the demand for forest products. We believe the focus of the special section was too narrow, particularly with respect to benefiting biodiversity, because herbicide use also intensifies the export of wood products and, thus, nutrients. Other factors that must be considered include soil acidification caused by biomass export and fertilizer application, as well as additional acidification resulting from aerial emissions. In addition, because of mineral cycle dynamics constraints, intensively managed forests may not be sustainable for wood production, and less so for forest-dependent animals. Extensively exploited forests may deplete mineral reserves, and any intensification likely would speed up the declines. We believe the indirect impact from herbicides through accelerating mineral export and loss needs to be addressed, in particular how it may affect mammals’ ability to accumulate essential trace elements. We contend using fertilizer applications as a corrective measure at the landscape level would be cost-prohibitive. Thus, heralding that herbicides, a tool to intensify wood production, benefit forest biodiversity appears premature, given the time scale of forest growth and soil development.Fil: Fluck, Werner Thomas. Swiss Tropical Institute; Suiza. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.. Fundación Arelauquen; ArgentinaAllen Press Inc.2006-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/273999Fluck, Werner Thomas; Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.; Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective; Allen Press Inc.; Wildlife Society Bulletin; 34; 5; 12-2006; 1472-14782328-5540CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.2193/0091-7648%282006%2934%5B1472%3AHAFBAA%5D2.0.CO%3B2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-11-12T09:48:37Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/273999instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-11-12 09:48:38.217CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective |
| title |
Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective |
| spellingShingle |
Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective Fluck, Werner Thomas wildlife trace mineral biomass export biogeochemical cycle |
| title_short |
Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective |
| title_full |
Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective |
| title_fullStr |
Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective |
| title_sort |
Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Fluck, Werner Thomas Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M. |
| author |
Fluck, Werner Thomas |
| author_facet |
Fluck, Werner Thomas Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M. |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
wildlife trace mineral biomass export biogeochemical cycle |
| topic |
wildlife trace mineral biomass export biogeochemical cycle |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Effects of herbicide use on forest biodiversity was the topic of a special section in the winter 2004 issue of The Wildlife Society Bulletin. In acknowledging public concerns regarding the toxic effects of herbicides, several of the contributing authors argued that these effects are negligible and that intensifying wood production would be beneficial for forest biodiversity and conservation by reducing habitat conversions. We contend there are other important environmental consequences; hence, responding to increased opportunities for selling wood products by augmenting supply through intensifying production should not be the only option. We argue that it is also important to develop mechanisms to reduce the demand for forest products. We believe the focus of the special section was too narrow, particularly with respect to benefiting biodiversity, because herbicide use also intensifies the export of wood products and, thus, nutrients. Other factors that must be considered include soil acidification caused by biomass export and fertilizer application, as well as additional acidification resulting from aerial emissions. In addition, because of mineral cycle dynamics constraints, intensively managed forests may not be sustainable for wood production, and less so for forest-dependent animals. Extensively exploited forests may deplete mineral reserves, and any intensification likely would speed up the declines. We believe the indirect impact from herbicides through accelerating mineral export and loss needs to be addressed, in particular how it may affect mammals’ ability to accumulate essential trace elements. We contend using fertilizer applications as a corrective measure at the landscape level would be cost-prohibitive. Thus, heralding that herbicides, a tool to intensify wood production, benefit forest biodiversity appears premature, given the time scale of forest growth and soil development. Fil: Fluck, Werner Thomas. Swiss Tropical Institute; Suiza. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.. Fundación Arelauquen; Argentina |
| description |
Effects of herbicide use on forest biodiversity was the topic of a special section in the winter 2004 issue of The Wildlife Society Bulletin. In acknowledging public concerns regarding the toxic effects of herbicides, several of the contributing authors argued that these effects are negligible and that intensifying wood production would be beneficial for forest biodiversity and conservation by reducing habitat conversions. We contend there are other important environmental consequences; hence, responding to increased opportunities for selling wood products by augmenting supply through intensifying production should not be the only option. We argue that it is also important to develop mechanisms to reduce the demand for forest products. We believe the focus of the special section was too narrow, particularly with respect to benefiting biodiversity, because herbicide use also intensifies the export of wood products and, thus, nutrients. Other factors that must be considered include soil acidification caused by biomass export and fertilizer application, as well as additional acidification resulting from aerial emissions. In addition, because of mineral cycle dynamics constraints, intensively managed forests may not be sustainable for wood production, and less so for forest-dependent animals. Extensively exploited forests may deplete mineral reserves, and any intensification likely would speed up the declines. We believe the indirect impact from herbicides through accelerating mineral export and loss needs to be addressed, in particular how it may affect mammals’ ability to accumulate essential trace elements. We contend using fertilizer applications as a corrective measure at the landscape level would be cost-prohibitive. Thus, heralding that herbicides, a tool to intensify wood production, benefit forest biodiversity appears premature, given the time scale of forest growth and soil development. |
| publishDate |
2006 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-12 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/273999 Fluck, Werner Thomas; Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.; Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective; Allen Press Inc.; Wildlife Society Bulletin; 34; 5; 12-2006; 1472-1478 2328-5540 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/273999 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Fluck, Werner Thomas; Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.; Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective; Allen Press Inc.; Wildlife Society Bulletin; 34; 5; 12-2006; 1472-1478 2328-5540 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.2193/0091-7648%282006%2934%5B1472%3AHAFBAA%5D2.0.CO%3B2 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Allen Press Inc. |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Allen Press Inc. |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1848598021614338048 |
| score |
13.24909 |