Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective

Autores
Fluck, Werner Thomas; Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.
Año de publicación
2006
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Effects of herbicide use on forest biodiversity was the topic of a special section in the winter 2004 issue of The Wildlife Society Bulletin. In acknowledging public concerns regarding the toxic effects of herbicides, several of the contributing authors argued that these effects are negligible and that intensifying wood production would be beneficial for forest biodiversity and conservation by reducing habitat conversions. We contend there are other important environmental consequences; hence, responding to increased opportunities for selling wood products by augmenting supply through intensifying production should not be the only option. We argue that it is also important to develop mechanisms to reduce the demand for forest products. We believe the focus of the special section was too narrow, particularly with respect to benefiting biodiversity, because herbicide use also intensifies the export of wood products and, thus, nutrients. Other factors that must be considered include soil acidification caused by biomass export and fertilizer application, as well as additional acidification resulting from aerial emissions. In addition, because of mineral cycle dynamics constraints, intensively managed forests may not be sustainable for wood production, and less so for forest-dependent animals. Extensively exploited forests may deplete mineral reserves, and any intensification likely would speed up the declines. We believe the indirect impact from herbicides through accelerating mineral export and loss needs to be addressed, in particular how it may affect mammals’ ability to accumulate essential trace elements. We contend using fertilizer applications as a corrective measure at the landscape level would be cost-prohibitive. Thus, heralding that herbicides, a tool to intensify wood production, benefit forest biodiversity appears premature, given the time scale of forest growth and soil development.
Fil: Fluck, Werner Thomas. Swiss Tropical Institute; Suiza. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.. Fundación Arelauquen; Argentina
Materia
wildlife
trace mineral
biomass export
biogeochemical cycle
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/273999

id CONICETDig_0cdc6ca29bfedffcdd05de911b4b6b10
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/273999
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspectiveFluck, Werner ThomasSmith Flueck, Jo Anne M.wildlifetrace mineralbiomass exportbiogeochemical cyclehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Effects of herbicide use on forest biodiversity was the topic of a special section in the winter 2004 issue of The Wildlife Society Bulletin. In acknowledging public concerns regarding the toxic effects of herbicides, several of the contributing authors argued that these effects are negligible and that intensifying wood production would be beneficial for forest biodiversity and conservation by reducing habitat conversions. We contend there are other important environmental consequences; hence, responding to increased opportunities for selling wood products by augmenting supply through intensifying production should not be the only option. We argue that it is also important to develop mechanisms to reduce the demand for forest products. We believe the focus of the special section was too narrow, particularly with respect to benefiting biodiversity, because herbicide use also intensifies the export of wood products and, thus, nutrients. Other factors that must be considered include soil acidification caused by biomass export and fertilizer application, as well as additional acidification resulting from aerial emissions. In addition, because of mineral cycle dynamics constraints, intensively managed forests may not be sustainable for wood production, and less so for forest-dependent animals. Extensively exploited forests may deplete mineral reserves, and any intensification likely would speed up the declines. We believe the indirect impact from herbicides through accelerating mineral export and loss needs to be addressed, in particular how it may affect mammals’ ability to accumulate essential trace elements. We contend using fertilizer applications as a corrective measure at the landscape level would be cost-prohibitive. Thus, heralding that herbicides, a tool to intensify wood production, benefit forest biodiversity appears premature, given the time scale of forest growth and soil development.Fil: Fluck, Werner Thomas. Swiss Tropical Institute; Suiza. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.. Fundación Arelauquen; ArgentinaAllen Press Inc.2006-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/273999Fluck, Werner Thomas; Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.; Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective; Allen Press Inc.; Wildlife Society Bulletin; 34; 5; 12-2006; 1472-14782328-5540CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.2193/0091-7648%282006%2934%5B1472%3AHAFBAA%5D2.0.CO%3B2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-11-12T09:48:37Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/273999instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-11-12 09:48:38.217CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective
title Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective
spellingShingle Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective
Fluck, Werner Thomas
wildlife
trace mineral
biomass export
biogeochemical cycle
title_short Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective
title_full Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective
title_fullStr Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective
title_full_unstemmed Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective
title_sort Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fluck, Werner Thomas
Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.
author Fluck, Werner Thomas
author_facet Fluck, Werner Thomas
Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.
author_role author
author2 Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv wildlife
trace mineral
biomass export
biogeochemical cycle
topic wildlife
trace mineral
biomass export
biogeochemical cycle
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Effects of herbicide use on forest biodiversity was the topic of a special section in the winter 2004 issue of The Wildlife Society Bulletin. In acknowledging public concerns regarding the toxic effects of herbicides, several of the contributing authors argued that these effects are negligible and that intensifying wood production would be beneficial for forest biodiversity and conservation by reducing habitat conversions. We contend there are other important environmental consequences; hence, responding to increased opportunities for selling wood products by augmenting supply through intensifying production should not be the only option. We argue that it is also important to develop mechanisms to reduce the demand for forest products. We believe the focus of the special section was too narrow, particularly with respect to benefiting biodiversity, because herbicide use also intensifies the export of wood products and, thus, nutrients. Other factors that must be considered include soil acidification caused by biomass export and fertilizer application, as well as additional acidification resulting from aerial emissions. In addition, because of mineral cycle dynamics constraints, intensively managed forests may not be sustainable for wood production, and less so for forest-dependent animals. Extensively exploited forests may deplete mineral reserves, and any intensification likely would speed up the declines. We believe the indirect impact from herbicides through accelerating mineral export and loss needs to be addressed, in particular how it may affect mammals’ ability to accumulate essential trace elements. We contend using fertilizer applications as a corrective measure at the landscape level would be cost-prohibitive. Thus, heralding that herbicides, a tool to intensify wood production, benefit forest biodiversity appears premature, given the time scale of forest growth and soil development.
Fil: Fluck, Werner Thomas. Swiss Tropical Institute; Suiza. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.. Fundación Arelauquen; Argentina
description Effects of herbicide use on forest biodiversity was the topic of a special section in the winter 2004 issue of The Wildlife Society Bulletin. In acknowledging public concerns regarding the toxic effects of herbicides, several of the contributing authors argued that these effects are negligible and that intensifying wood production would be beneficial for forest biodiversity and conservation by reducing habitat conversions. We contend there are other important environmental consequences; hence, responding to increased opportunities for selling wood products by augmenting supply through intensifying production should not be the only option. We argue that it is also important to develop mechanisms to reduce the demand for forest products. We believe the focus of the special section was too narrow, particularly with respect to benefiting biodiversity, because herbicide use also intensifies the export of wood products and, thus, nutrients. Other factors that must be considered include soil acidification caused by biomass export and fertilizer application, as well as additional acidification resulting from aerial emissions. In addition, because of mineral cycle dynamics constraints, intensively managed forests may not be sustainable for wood production, and less so for forest-dependent animals. Extensively exploited forests may deplete mineral reserves, and any intensification likely would speed up the declines. We believe the indirect impact from herbicides through accelerating mineral export and loss needs to be addressed, in particular how it may affect mammals’ ability to accumulate essential trace elements. We contend using fertilizer applications as a corrective measure at the landscape level would be cost-prohibitive. Thus, heralding that herbicides, a tool to intensify wood production, benefit forest biodiversity appears premature, given the time scale of forest growth and soil development.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/273999
Fluck, Werner Thomas; Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.; Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective; Allen Press Inc.; Wildlife Society Bulletin; 34; 5; 12-2006; 1472-1478
2328-5540
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/273999
identifier_str_mv Fluck, Werner Thomas; Smith Flueck, Jo Anne M.; Herbicides and forest biodiversity: an alternative perspective; Allen Press Inc.; Wildlife Society Bulletin; 34; 5; 12-2006; 1472-1478
2328-5540
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.2193/0091-7648%282006%2934%5B1472%3AHAFBAA%5D2.0.CO%3B2
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Allen Press Inc.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Allen Press Inc.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1848598021614338048
score 13.24909