Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States

Autores
Cremonte, Mariana; Ledesma, Ruben Daniel; Cherpitel, Cheryl; Borges, Guilherme
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The objective of this article is to report psychometric characteristics of the AUDIT, CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK and to compare them across three countries: Argentina, Mexico, and the United States which used a similar protocol and methodology. Probability samples of patients 18 years and older were drawn from emergency departments in Mar del Plata, Argentina (n=780), Pachuca, Mexico (n=1624) and Santa Clara, U.S. (n=1220). Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing their performance against a diagnosis of alcohol dependence (DSM-IV) obtained through the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and for the briefer measures, also by their correlation with the AUDIT. The internal consistency of the CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK scores was estimated by the KR-20 formula and by Cronbach?s Alpha for the AUDIT. Corrected item-total correlation and D-values were used as item discrimination measures. In Argentina and Mexico the AUDIT and the RAPS4 showed the highest validity. Reliability of all instruments was higher in the US than in Argentina or Mexico. In all three countries, reliability of the TWEAK was lowest, while the AUDIT was highest. With a few exceptions, all items showed good discrimination powers.
Fil: Cremonte, Mariana. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología. Introducción a la Investigación Psicológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: Ledesma, Ruben Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología. Introducción a la Investigación Psicológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: Cherpitel, Cheryl. No especifíca;
Fil: Borges, Guilherme. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; México
Materia
ALCOHOL
SCREENING
PSYCHOMETRIC
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
ARGENTINA
MEXICO
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242959
Acceder
id CONICETDig_0836d406479c1f4772ae8fc330755e66
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242959
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United StatesCremonte, MarianaLedesma, Ruben DanielCherpitel, CherylBorges, GuilhermeALCOHOLSCREENINGPSYCHOMETRICEMERGENCY DEPARTMENTARGENTINAMEXICOhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The objective of this article is to report psychometric characteristics of the AUDIT, CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK and to compare them across three countries: Argentina, Mexico, and the United States which used a similar protocol and methodology. Probability samples of patients 18 years and older were drawn from emergency departments in Mar del Plata, Argentina (n=780), Pachuca, Mexico (n=1624) and Santa Clara, U.S. (n=1220). Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing their performance against a diagnosis of alcohol dependence (DSM-IV) obtained through the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and for the briefer measures, also by their correlation with the AUDIT. The internal consistency of the CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK scores was estimated by the KR-20 formula and by Cronbach?s Alpha for the AUDIT. Corrected item-total correlation and D-values were used as item discrimination measures. In Argentina and Mexico the AUDIT and the RAPS4 showed the highest validity. Reliability of all instruments was higher in the US than in Argentina or Mexico. In all three countries, reliability of the TWEAK was lowest, while the AUDIT was highest. With a few exceptions, all items showed good discrimination powers.Fil: Cremonte, Mariana. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología. Introducción a la Investigación Psicológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; ArgentinaFil: Ledesma, Ruben Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología. Introducción a la Investigación Psicológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; ArgentinaFil: Cherpitel, Cheryl. No especifíca;Fil: Borges, Guilherme. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; MéxicoPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd2010-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/242959Cremonte, Mariana; Ledesma, Ruben Daniel; Cherpitel, Cheryl; Borges, Guilherme; Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Addictive Behaviors.; 35; 6-2010; 818-8250306-4603CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460310001000info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.03.021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:31:39Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242959instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:31:40.091CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States
title Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States
spellingShingle Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States
Cremonte, Mariana
ALCOHOL
SCREENING
PSYCHOMETRIC
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
ARGENTINA
MEXICO
title_short Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States
title_full Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States
title_fullStr Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States
title_sort Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cremonte, Mariana
Ledesma, Ruben Daniel
Cherpitel, Cheryl
Borges, Guilherme
author Cremonte, Mariana
author_facet Cremonte, Mariana
Ledesma, Ruben Daniel
Cherpitel, Cheryl
Borges, Guilherme
author_role author
author2 Ledesma, Ruben Daniel
Cherpitel, Cheryl
Borges, Guilherme
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ALCOHOL
SCREENING
PSYCHOMETRIC
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
ARGENTINA
MEXICO
topic ALCOHOL
SCREENING
PSYCHOMETRIC
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
ARGENTINA
MEXICO
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The objective of this article is to report psychometric characteristics of the AUDIT, CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK and to compare them across three countries: Argentina, Mexico, and the United States which used a similar protocol and methodology. Probability samples of patients 18 years and older were drawn from emergency departments in Mar del Plata, Argentina (n=780), Pachuca, Mexico (n=1624) and Santa Clara, U.S. (n=1220). Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing their performance against a diagnosis of alcohol dependence (DSM-IV) obtained through the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and for the briefer measures, also by their correlation with the AUDIT. The internal consistency of the CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK scores was estimated by the KR-20 formula and by Cronbach?s Alpha for the AUDIT. Corrected item-total correlation and D-values were used as item discrimination measures. In Argentina and Mexico the AUDIT and the RAPS4 showed the highest validity. Reliability of all instruments was higher in the US than in Argentina or Mexico. In all three countries, reliability of the TWEAK was lowest, while the AUDIT was highest. With a few exceptions, all items showed good discrimination powers.
Fil: Cremonte, Mariana. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología. Introducción a la Investigación Psicológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: Ledesma, Ruben Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología. Introducción a la Investigación Psicológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: Cherpitel, Cheryl. No especifíca;
Fil: Borges, Guilherme. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; México
description The objective of this article is to report psychometric characteristics of the AUDIT, CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK and to compare them across three countries: Argentina, Mexico, and the United States which used a similar protocol and methodology. Probability samples of patients 18 years and older were drawn from emergency departments in Mar del Plata, Argentina (n=780), Pachuca, Mexico (n=1624) and Santa Clara, U.S. (n=1220). Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing their performance against a diagnosis of alcohol dependence (DSM-IV) obtained through the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and for the briefer measures, also by their correlation with the AUDIT. The internal consistency of the CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK scores was estimated by the KR-20 formula and by Cronbach?s Alpha for the AUDIT. Corrected item-total correlation and D-values were used as item discrimination measures. In Argentina and Mexico the AUDIT and the RAPS4 showed the highest validity. Reliability of all instruments was higher in the US than in Argentina or Mexico. In all three countries, reliability of the TWEAK was lowest, while the AUDIT was highest. With a few exceptions, all items showed good discrimination powers.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242959
Cremonte, Mariana; Ledesma, Ruben Daniel; Cherpitel, Cheryl; Borges, Guilherme; Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Addictive Behaviors.; 35; 6-2010; 818-825
0306-4603
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242959
identifier_str_mv Cremonte, Mariana; Ledesma, Ruben Daniel; Cherpitel, Cheryl; Borges, Guilherme; Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Addictive Behaviors.; 35; 6-2010; 818-825
0306-4603
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460310001000
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.03.021
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083451771420672
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares