Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States
- Autores
- Cremonte, Mariana; Ledesma, Ruben Daniel; Cherpitel, Cheryl; Borges, Guilherme
- Año de publicación
- 2010
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The objective of this article is to report psychometric characteristics of the AUDIT, CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK and to compare them across three countries: Argentina, Mexico, and the United States which used a similar protocol and methodology. Probability samples of patients 18 years and older were drawn from emergency departments in Mar del Plata, Argentina (n=780), Pachuca, Mexico (n=1624) and Santa Clara, U.S. (n=1220). Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing their performance against a diagnosis of alcohol dependence (DSM-IV) obtained through the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and for the briefer measures, also by their correlation with the AUDIT. The internal consistency of the CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK scores was estimated by the KR-20 formula and by Cronbach?s Alpha for the AUDIT. Corrected item-total correlation and D-values were used as item discrimination measures. In Argentina and Mexico the AUDIT and the RAPS4 showed the highest validity. Reliability of all instruments was higher in the US than in Argentina or Mexico. In all three countries, reliability of the TWEAK was lowest, while the AUDIT was highest. With a few exceptions, all items showed good discrimination powers.
Fil: Cremonte, Mariana. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología. Introducción a la Investigación Psicológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: Ledesma, Ruben Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología. Introducción a la Investigación Psicológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina
Fil: Cherpitel, Cheryl. No especifíca;
Fil: Borges, Guilherme. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; México - Materia
-
ALCOHOL
SCREENING
PSYCHOMETRIC
EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
ARGENTINA
MEXICO - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242959
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_0836d406479c1f4772ae8fc330755e66 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242959 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United StatesCremonte, MarianaLedesma, Ruben DanielCherpitel, CherylBorges, GuilhermeALCOHOLSCREENINGPSYCHOMETRICEMERGENCY DEPARTMENTARGENTINAMEXICOhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The objective of this article is to report psychometric characteristics of the AUDIT, CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK and to compare them across three countries: Argentina, Mexico, and the United States which used a similar protocol and methodology. Probability samples of patients 18 years and older were drawn from emergency departments in Mar del Plata, Argentina (n=780), Pachuca, Mexico (n=1624) and Santa Clara, U.S. (n=1220). Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing their performance against a diagnosis of alcohol dependence (DSM-IV) obtained through the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and for the briefer measures, also by their correlation with the AUDIT. The internal consistency of the CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK scores was estimated by the KR-20 formula and by Cronbach?s Alpha for the AUDIT. Corrected item-total correlation and D-values were used as item discrimination measures. In Argentina and Mexico the AUDIT and the RAPS4 showed the highest validity. Reliability of all instruments was higher in the US than in Argentina or Mexico. In all three countries, reliability of the TWEAK was lowest, while the AUDIT was highest. With a few exceptions, all items showed good discrimination powers.Fil: Cremonte, Mariana. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología. Introducción a la Investigación Psicológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; ArgentinaFil: Ledesma, Ruben Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología. Introducción a la Investigación Psicológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; ArgentinaFil: Cherpitel, Cheryl. No especifíca;Fil: Borges, Guilherme. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; MéxicoPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd2010-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/242959Cremonte, Mariana; Ledesma, Ruben Daniel; Cherpitel, Cheryl; Borges, Guilherme; Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Addictive Behaviors.; 35; 6-2010; 818-8250306-4603CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460310001000info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.03.021info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:34:12Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/242959instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:34:12.507CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States |
title |
Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States |
spellingShingle |
Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States Cremonte, Mariana ALCOHOL SCREENING PSYCHOMETRIC EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ARGENTINA MEXICO |
title_short |
Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States |
title_full |
Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States |
title_fullStr |
Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States |
title_full_unstemmed |
Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States |
title_sort |
Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Cremonte, Mariana Ledesma, Ruben Daniel Cherpitel, Cheryl Borges, Guilherme |
author |
Cremonte, Mariana |
author_facet |
Cremonte, Mariana Ledesma, Ruben Daniel Cherpitel, Cheryl Borges, Guilherme |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ledesma, Ruben Daniel Cherpitel, Cheryl Borges, Guilherme |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
ALCOHOL SCREENING PSYCHOMETRIC EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ARGENTINA MEXICO |
topic |
ALCOHOL SCREENING PSYCHOMETRIC EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ARGENTINA MEXICO |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The objective of this article is to report psychometric characteristics of the AUDIT, CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK and to compare them across three countries: Argentina, Mexico, and the United States which used a similar protocol and methodology. Probability samples of patients 18 years and older were drawn from emergency departments in Mar del Plata, Argentina (n=780), Pachuca, Mexico (n=1624) and Santa Clara, U.S. (n=1220). Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing their performance against a diagnosis of alcohol dependence (DSM-IV) obtained through the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and for the briefer measures, also by their correlation with the AUDIT. The internal consistency of the CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK scores was estimated by the KR-20 formula and by Cronbach?s Alpha for the AUDIT. Corrected item-total correlation and D-values were used as item discrimination measures. In Argentina and Mexico the AUDIT and the RAPS4 showed the highest validity. Reliability of all instruments was higher in the US than in Argentina or Mexico. In all three countries, reliability of the TWEAK was lowest, while the AUDIT was highest. With a few exceptions, all items showed good discrimination powers. Fil: Cremonte, Mariana. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología. Introducción a la Investigación Psicológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina Fil: Ledesma, Ruben Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Psicología. Introducción a la Investigación Psicológica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina Fil: Cherpitel, Cheryl. No especifíca; Fil: Borges, Guilherme. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana; México |
description |
The objective of this article is to report psychometric characteristics of the AUDIT, CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK and to compare them across three countries: Argentina, Mexico, and the United States which used a similar protocol and methodology. Probability samples of patients 18 years and older were drawn from emergency departments in Mar del Plata, Argentina (n=780), Pachuca, Mexico (n=1624) and Santa Clara, U.S. (n=1220). Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing their performance against a diagnosis of alcohol dependence (DSM-IV) obtained through the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and for the briefer measures, also by their correlation with the AUDIT. The internal consistency of the CAGE, RAPS4, and TWEAK scores was estimated by the KR-20 formula and by Cronbach?s Alpha for the AUDIT. Corrected item-total correlation and D-values were used as item discrimination measures. In Argentina and Mexico the AUDIT and the RAPS4 showed the highest validity. Reliability of all instruments was higher in the US than in Argentina or Mexico. In all three countries, reliability of the TWEAK was lowest, while the AUDIT was highest. With a few exceptions, all items showed good discrimination powers. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242959 Cremonte, Mariana; Ledesma, Ruben Daniel; Cherpitel, Cheryl; Borges, Guilherme; Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Addictive Behaviors.; 35; 6-2010; 818-825 0306-4603 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/242959 |
identifier_str_mv |
Cremonte, Mariana; Ledesma, Ruben Daniel; Cherpitel, Cheryl; Borges, Guilherme; Psychometric properties of alcohol screening tests in Emergency Departments in Argentina, Mexico and the United States; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Addictive Behaviors.; 35; 6-2010; 818-825 0306-4603 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460310001000 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.03.021 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614358586359808 |
score |
13.070432 |