Shear Strength Behavior of Different Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure from Direct Shear Test

Autores
Useche Infante, Danny Jose; Aiassa Martinez, Gonzalo Martin; Arrua, Pedro Ariel; Eberhardt, Marcelo Gabriel
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This paper presents the results of direct shear test on soil samples reinforced with geosynthetics, conducted with the aim of characterize the shear strength of reinforced soil composite. Two types of granular soil (well graded sand and silty sand) and four types of geosynthetic (woven and nonwoven geotextile—uniaxial and biaxial geogrid) were selected. Laboratory testing program were performed in two shear boxes, circular box with 63 mm in diameter and square box with 100 mm in length; the samples were made with loose and dense sand; the reinforcement layer was placed perpendicular to the failure surface; tests are conducted with three vertical confining pressures: 15.7, 31.4 and 62.8 kPa. The effect of different factors that influence the results of the shear tests is analyzed, such as: the particle size of soils, density of soils, shear box size and type of geosynthetics. The test results reveal that the maximum value of shear strength improvement was achieved for dense silty sand samples reinforced with biaxial geogrid. In general, the improvement was more favorable for samples reinforced with geogrid compared to samples reinforced with geotextile.
Fil: Useche Infante, Danny Jose. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Aiassa Martinez, Gonzalo Martin. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil; Argentina
Fil: Arrua, Pedro Ariel. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil; Argentina
Fil: Eberhardt, Marcelo Gabriel. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil; Argentina
Materia
DIRECT SHEAR TEST
GEOSYNTHETICS
REINFORCED SAND
SHEAR STRENGTH IMPROVEMENT
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/179690
Acceder
id CONICETDig_06f1e14bea73c063896dd9b77c959ffc
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/179690
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Shear Strength Behavior of Different Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure from Direct Shear TestUseche Infante, Danny JoseAiassa Martinez, Gonzalo MartinArrua, Pedro ArielEberhardt, Marcelo GabrielDIRECT SHEAR TESTGEOSYNTHETICSREINFORCED SANDSHEAR STRENGTH IMPROVEMENThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2This paper presents the results of direct shear test on soil samples reinforced with geosynthetics, conducted with the aim of characterize the shear strength of reinforced soil composite. Two types of granular soil (well graded sand and silty sand) and four types of geosynthetic (woven and nonwoven geotextile—uniaxial and biaxial geogrid) were selected. Laboratory testing program were performed in two shear boxes, circular box with 63 mm in diameter and square box with 100 mm in length; the samples were made with loose and dense sand; the reinforcement layer was placed perpendicular to the failure surface; tests are conducted with three vertical confining pressures: 15.7, 31.4 and 62.8 kPa. The effect of different factors that influence the results of the shear tests is analyzed, such as: the particle size of soils, density of soils, shear box size and type of geosynthetics. The test results reveal that the maximum value of shear strength improvement was achieved for dense silty sand samples reinforced with biaxial geogrid. In general, the improvement was more favorable for samples reinforced with geogrid compared to samples reinforced with geotextile.Fil: Useche Infante, Danny Jose. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Aiassa Martinez, Gonzalo Martin. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil; ArgentinaFil: Arrua, Pedro Ariel. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil; ArgentinaFil: Eberhardt, Marcelo Gabriel. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil; ArgentinaSpringer2016-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/179690Useche Infante, Danny Jose; Aiassa Martinez, Gonzalo Martin; Arrua, Pedro Ariel; Eberhardt, Marcelo Gabriel; Shear Strength Behavior of Different Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure from Direct Shear Test; Springer; International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering; 2; 2; 5-2016; 1-162199-92602199-9279CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40891-016-0058-2info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s40891-016-0058-2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:12:38Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/179690instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:12:38.989CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Shear Strength Behavior of Different Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure from Direct Shear Test
title Shear Strength Behavior of Different Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure from Direct Shear Test
spellingShingle Shear Strength Behavior of Different Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure from Direct Shear Test
Useche Infante, Danny Jose
DIRECT SHEAR TEST
GEOSYNTHETICS
REINFORCED SAND
SHEAR STRENGTH IMPROVEMENT
title_short Shear Strength Behavior of Different Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure from Direct Shear Test
title_full Shear Strength Behavior of Different Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure from Direct Shear Test
title_fullStr Shear Strength Behavior of Different Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure from Direct Shear Test
title_full_unstemmed Shear Strength Behavior of Different Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure from Direct Shear Test
title_sort Shear Strength Behavior of Different Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure from Direct Shear Test
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Useche Infante, Danny Jose
Aiassa Martinez, Gonzalo Martin
Arrua, Pedro Ariel
Eberhardt, Marcelo Gabriel
author Useche Infante, Danny Jose
author_facet Useche Infante, Danny Jose
Aiassa Martinez, Gonzalo Martin
Arrua, Pedro Ariel
Eberhardt, Marcelo Gabriel
author_role author
author2 Aiassa Martinez, Gonzalo Martin
Arrua, Pedro Ariel
Eberhardt, Marcelo Gabriel
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DIRECT SHEAR TEST
GEOSYNTHETICS
REINFORCED SAND
SHEAR STRENGTH IMPROVEMENT
topic DIRECT SHEAR TEST
GEOSYNTHETICS
REINFORCED SAND
SHEAR STRENGTH IMPROVEMENT
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This paper presents the results of direct shear test on soil samples reinforced with geosynthetics, conducted with the aim of characterize the shear strength of reinforced soil composite. Two types of granular soil (well graded sand and silty sand) and four types of geosynthetic (woven and nonwoven geotextile—uniaxial and biaxial geogrid) were selected. Laboratory testing program were performed in two shear boxes, circular box with 63 mm in diameter and square box with 100 mm in length; the samples were made with loose and dense sand; the reinforcement layer was placed perpendicular to the failure surface; tests are conducted with three vertical confining pressures: 15.7, 31.4 and 62.8 kPa. The effect of different factors that influence the results of the shear tests is analyzed, such as: the particle size of soils, density of soils, shear box size and type of geosynthetics. The test results reveal that the maximum value of shear strength improvement was achieved for dense silty sand samples reinforced with biaxial geogrid. In general, the improvement was more favorable for samples reinforced with geogrid compared to samples reinforced with geotextile.
Fil: Useche Infante, Danny Jose. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Aiassa Martinez, Gonzalo Martin. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil; Argentina
Fil: Arrua, Pedro Ariel. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil; Argentina
Fil: Eberhardt, Marcelo Gabriel. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba. Departamento de Ingeniería Civil; Argentina
description This paper presents the results of direct shear test on soil samples reinforced with geosynthetics, conducted with the aim of characterize the shear strength of reinforced soil composite. Two types of granular soil (well graded sand and silty sand) and four types of geosynthetic (woven and nonwoven geotextile—uniaxial and biaxial geogrid) were selected. Laboratory testing program were performed in two shear boxes, circular box with 63 mm in diameter and square box with 100 mm in length; the samples were made with loose and dense sand; the reinforcement layer was placed perpendicular to the failure surface; tests are conducted with three vertical confining pressures: 15.7, 31.4 and 62.8 kPa. The effect of different factors that influence the results of the shear tests is analyzed, such as: the particle size of soils, density of soils, shear box size and type of geosynthetics. The test results reveal that the maximum value of shear strength improvement was achieved for dense silty sand samples reinforced with biaxial geogrid. In general, the improvement was more favorable for samples reinforced with geogrid compared to samples reinforced with geotextile.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/179690
Useche Infante, Danny Jose; Aiassa Martinez, Gonzalo Martin; Arrua, Pedro Ariel; Eberhardt, Marcelo Gabriel; Shear Strength Behavior of Different Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure from Direct Shear Test; Springer; International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering; 2; 2; 5-2016; 1-16
2199-9260
2199-9279
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/179690
identifier_str_mv Useche Infante, Danny Jose; Aiassa Martinez, Gonzalo Martin; Arrua, Pedro Ariel; Eberhardt, Marcelo Gabriel; Shear Strength Behavior of Different Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure from Direct Shear Test; Springer; International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering; 2; 2; 5-2016; 1-16
2199-9260
2199-9279
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40891-016-0058-2
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s40891-016-0058-2
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980660702085120
score 12.993085

Publicaciones similares