Roads to the past: how to go and not to go backward in time in quantum theories

Autores
López, Cristian Ariel
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In this article I shall defend, against the conventional understanding of the matter, that two coherent and tenable approaches to time reversal can be suitably introduced in standard quantum mechanics: an “orthodox” approach that demands time reversal to be represented in terms of an anti-unitary and anti-linear time-reversal operator, and a “heterodox” approach that represents time reversal in terms of a unitary, linear time-reversal operator. The rationale shall be that the orthodox approach in quantum theories assumes a relationalist metaphysics of time, according to which time reversal is nothing but motion reversal. But, when one shifts gears and turn to a substantivalist metaphysics of time the heterodox approach to time reversal in quantum mechanics comes up in a more natural way.
Fil: López, Cristian Ariel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Universite de Lausanne; Suiza. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
METAPHYSICS OF TIME
QUANTUM THEORIES
RELATIONALISM
SUBSTANTIVALISM
TIME REVERSAL
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121168

id CONICETDig_013fe95cbb8d569865ab3994aac051b5
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121168
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Roads to the past: how to go and not to go backward in time in quantum theoriesLópez, Cristian ArielMETAPHYSICS OF TIMEQUANTUM THEORIESRELATIONALISMSUBSTANTIVALISMTIME REVERSALhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In this article I shall defend, against the conventional understanding of the matter, that two coherent and tenable approaches to time reversal can be suitably introduced in standard quantum mechanics: an “orthodox” approach that demands time reversal to be represented in terms of an anti-unitary and anti-linear time-reversal operator, and a “heterodox” approach that represents time reversal in terms of a unitary, linear time-reversal operator. The rationale shall be that the orthodox approach in quantum theories assumes a relationalist metaphysics of time, according to which time reversal is nothing but motion reversal. But, when one shifts gears and turn to a substantivalist metaphysics of time the heterodox approach to time reversal in quantum mechanics comes up in a more natural way.Fil: López, Cristian Ariel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Universite de Lausanne; Suiza. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaSpringer Netherlands2019-03-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/121168López, Cristian Ariel; Roads to the past: how to go and not to go backward in time in quantum theories; Springer Netherlands; European Journal for Philosophy of Science; 9; 27; 18-3-2019; 1-171879-4912CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s13194-019-0250-zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13194-019-0250-zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:48:48Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121168instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:48:48.642CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Roads to the past: how to go and not to go backward in time in quantum theories
title Roads to the past: how to go and not to go backward in time in quantum theories
spellingShingle Roads to the past: how to go and not to go backward in time in quantum theories
López, Cristian Ariel
METAPHYSICS OF TIME
QUANTUM THEORIES
RELATIONALISM
SUBSTANTIVALISM
TIME REVERSAL
title_short Roads to the past: how to go and not to go backward in time in quantum theories
title_full Roads to the past: how to go and not to go backward in time in quantum theories
title_fullStr Roads to the past: how to go and not to go backward in time in quantum theories
title_full_unstemmed Roads to the past: how to go and not to go backward in time in quantum theories
title_sort Roads to the past: how to go and not to go backward in time in quantum theories
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv López, Cristian Ariel
author López, Cristian Ariel
author_facet López, Cristian Ariel
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv METAPHYSICS OF TIME
QUANTUM THEORIES
RELATIONALISM
SUBSTANTIVALISM
TIME REVERSAL
topic METAPHYSICS OF TIME
QUANTUM THEORIES
RELATIONALISM
SUBSTANTIVALISM
TIME REVERSAL
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this article I shall defend, against the conventional understanding of the matter, that two coherent and tenable approaches to time reversal can be suitably introduced in standard quantum mechanics: an “orthodox” approach that demands time reversal to be represented in terms of an anti-unitary and anti-linear time-reversal operator, and a “heterodox” approach that represents time reversal in terms of a unitary, linear time-reversal operator. The rationale shall be that the orthodox approach in quantum theories assumes a relationalist metaphysics of time, according to which time reversal is nothing but motion reversal. But, when one shifts gears and turn to a substantivalist metaphysics of time the heterodox approach to time reversal in quantum mechanics comes up in a more natural way.
Fil: López, Cristian Ariel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Universite de Lausanne; Suiza. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description In this article I shall defend, against the conventional understanding of the matter, that two coherent and tenable approaches to time reversal can be suitably introduced in standard quantum mechanics: an “orthodox” approach that demands time reversal to be represented in terms of an anti-unitary and anti-linear time-reversal operator, and a “heterodox” approach that represents time reversal in terms of a unitary, linear time-reversal operator. The rationale shall be that the orthodox approach in quantum theories assumes a relationalist metaphysics of time, according to which time reversal is nothing but motion reversal. But, when one shifts gears and turn to a substantivalist metaphysics of time the heterodox approach to time reversal in quantum mechanics comes up in a more natural way.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-18
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/121168
López, Cristian Ariel; Roads to the past: how to go and not to go backward in time in quantum theories; Springer Netherlands; European Journal for Philosophy of Science; 9; 27; 18-3-2019; 1-17
1879-4912
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/121168
identifier_str_mv López, Cristian Ariel; Roads to the past: how to go and not to go backward in time in quantum theories; Springer Netherlands; European Journal for Philosophy of Science; 9; 27; 18-3-2019; 1-17
1879-4912
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s13194-019-0250-z
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13194-019-0250-z
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Netherlands
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Netherlands
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613514000334848
score 13.070432