A Mixed Usability Evaluation on a Multi Criteria Group Decision Support System in Agriculture
- Autores
- Grigera, Julián; Garrido, Alejandra; Zarate, Pascale; Camilleri, Guy; Fernández, Alejandro
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión enviada
- Descripción
- Decision Support Systems (DSS) help users make decisions by organizing the decision-making process in stages, dealing with several input sources. In the agricultural context, these tools are becoming more important given the variety of data that producers face, market regulations and interaction of several actors with different backgrounds. Different DSS have existed for years, but their adoption is reportedly very low, being poor usability one of the most relevant factors. While there are surveys indicating this, we have not found usability evaluations on DSS with concrete results. In this work, we evaluated decision-making in the agricultural domain using a group DSS called GRUS. We present 3 different usability evaluations: a heuristic evaluation, a user test, and an automated diagnosis.
- Materia
-
Ingenierías y Tecnologías
Usability
Multi-citeria
Decision support - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires
- OAI Identificador
- oai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/10582
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CICBA_7c1955605a2c059c0cdb1593b453bb36 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/10582 |
network_acronym_str |
CICBA |
repository_id_str |
9441 |
network_name_str |
CIC Digital (CICBA) |
spelling |
A Mixed Usability Evaluation on a Multi Criteria Group Decision Support System in AgricultureGrigera, JuliánGarrido, AlejandraZarate, PascaleCamilleri, GuyFernández, AlejandroIngenierías y TecnologíasUsabilityMulti-citeriaDecision supportDecision Support Systems (DSS) help users make decisions by organizing the decision-making process in stages, dealing with several input sources. In the agricultural context, these tools are becoming more important given the variety of data that producers face, market regulations and interaction of several actors with different backgrounds. Different DSS have existed for years, but their adoption is reportedly very low, being poor usability one of the most relevant factors. While there are surveys indicating this, we have not found usability evaluations on DSS with concrete results. In this work, we evaluated decision-making in the agricultural domain using a group DSS called GRUS. We present 3 different usability evaluations: a heuristic evaluation, a user test, and an automated diagnosis.2018-09-12info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttps://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/10582enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/reponame:CIC Digital (CICBA)instname:Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Airesinstacron:CICBA2025-09-29T13:40:15Zoai:digital.cic.gba.gob.ar:11746/10582Institucionalhttp://digital.cic.gba.gob.arOrganismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/oai/snrdmarisa.degiusti@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:94412025-09-29 13:40:15.852CIC Digital (CICBA) - Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Airesfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Mixed Usability Evaluation on a Multi Criteria Group Decision Support System in Agriculture |
title |
A Mixed Usability Evaluation on a Multi Criteria Group Decision Support System in Agriculture |
spellingShingle |
A Mixed Usability Evaluation on a Multi Criteria Group Decision Support System in Agriculture Grigera, Julián Ingenierías y Tecnologías Usability Multi-citeria Decision support |
title_short |
A Mixed Usability Evaluation on a Multi Criteria Group Decision Support System in Agriculture |
title_full |
A Mixed Usability Evaluation on a Multi Criteria Group Decision Support System in Agriculture |
title_fullStr |
A Mixed Usability Evaluation on a Multi Criteria Group Decision Support System in Agriculture |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Mixed Usability Evaluation on a Multi Criteria Group Decision Support System in Agriculture |
title_sort |
A Mixed Usability Evaluation on a Multi Criteria Group Decision Support System in Agriculture |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Grigera, Julián Garrido, Alejandra Zarate, Pascale Camilleri, Guy Fernández, Alejandro |
author |
Grigera, Julián |
author_facet |
Grigera, Julián Garrido, Alejandra Zarate, Pascale Camilleri, Guy Fernández, Alejandro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Garrido, Alejandra Zarate, Pascale Camilleri, Guy Fernández, Alejandro |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ingenierías y Tecnologías Usability Multi-citeria Decision support |
topic |
Ingenierías y Tecnologías Usability Multi-citeria Decision support |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Decision Support Systems (DSS) help users make decisions by organizing the decision-making process in stages, dealing with several input sources. In the agricultural context, these tools are becoming more important given the variety of data that producers face, market regulations and interaction of several actors with different backgrounds. Different DSS have existed for years, but their adoption is reportedly very low, being poor usability one of the most relevant factors. While there are surveys indicating this, we have not found usability evaluations on DSS with concrete results. In this work, we evaluated decision-making in the agricultural domain using a group DSS called GRUS. We present 3 different usability evaluations: a heuristic evaluation, a user test, and an automated diagnosis. |
description |
Decision Support Systems (DSS) help users make decisions by organizing the decision-making process in stages, dealing with several input sources. In the agricultural context, these tools are becoming more important given the variety of data that producers face, market regulations and interaction of several actors with different backgrounds. Different DSS have existed for years, but their adoption is reportedly very low, being poor usability one of the most relevant factors. While there are surveys indicating this, we have not found usability evaluations on DSS with concrete results. In this work, we evaluated decision-making in the agricultural domain using a group DSS called GRUS. We present 3 different usability evaluations: a heuristic evaluation, a user test, and an automated diagnosis. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
submittedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/10582 |
url |
https://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/10582 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CIC Digital (CICBA) instname:Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires instacron:CICBA |
reponame_str |
CIC Digital (CICBA) |
collection |
CIC Digital (CICBA) |
instname_str |
Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires |
instacron_str |
CICBA |
institution |
CICBA |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CIC Digital (CICBA) - Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
marisa.degiusti@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1844618612452622336 |
score |
13.070432 |