Olfactory learning by means of trophallaxis in Apis mellifera

Autores
Gil, M.; De Marco, R.J.
Año de publicación
2005
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Early reports indicate that trophallaxis, i.e. the exchange of liquid food by mouth, may allow honeybees to assign nectar odours with predictive values to anticipate biological meaningful reward stimuli. Nevertheless, this type of learning has not been addressed directly. In the present study, pairs of animals were isolated to induce trophallaxis under controlled conditions and, afterwards, the honeybee proboscis extension reflex was used to investigate the possible role of trophallaxis in learning olfactory cues. The results demonstrate unambiguously that associative learning actually occurs by means of trophallaxis. Animals associate the odour (as the conditioned stimulus or CS) and the sucrose (as the unconditioned stimulus or US) present in the solution they receive through trophallaxis. Moreover, this particular kind of learning leads to long-term olfactory memories after a single learning trial, even when trophallaxis is brief. In addition, we found that the strength of association is clearly affected by CS and US intensity as well as the recent previous foraging experiences of the animals. Comparisons are presented among several features of the learning during trophallaxis and the classical conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex with restrained subjects. Finally, the relevance of learning through trophallaxis in the task of successful foraging is discussed.
Fil:Gil, M. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.
Fil:De Marco, R.J. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.
Fuente
J. Exp. Biol. 2005;208(4):671-680
Materia
Apis mellifera
Associative learning
Honeybee
Olfactory conditioning
Trophallaxis
analysis of variance
animal
article
association
bee
comparative study
conditioned reflex
feeding behavior
learning
odor
physiology
Analysis of Variance
Animals
Association Learning
Bees
Conditioning, Classical
Cues
Feeding Behavior
Odors
Smell
Animalia
Apis mellifera
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar
Repositorio
Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
OAI Identificador
paperaa:paper_00220949_v208_n4_p671_Gil

id BDUBAFCEN_ddb3b65c0b5f9968c25a2a28718d905e
oai_identifier_str paperaa:paper_00220949_v208_n4_p671_Gil
network_acronym_str BDUBAFCEN
repository_id_str 1896
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
spelling Olfactory learning by means of trophallaxis in Apis melliferaGil, M.De Marco, R.J.Apis melliferaAssociative learningHoneybeeOlfactory conditioningTrophallaxisanalysis of varianceanimalarticleassociationbeecomparative studyconditioned reflexfeeding behaviorlearningodorphysiologyAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAssociation LearningBeesConditioning, ClassicalCuesFeeding BehaviorOdorsSmellAnimaliaApis melliferaEarly reports indicate that trophallaxis, i.e. the exchange of liquid food by mouth, may allow honeybees to assign nectar odours with predictive values to anticipate biological meaningful reward stimuli. Nevertheless, this type of learning has not been addressed directly. In the present study, pairs of animals were isolated to induce trophallaxis under controlled conditions and, afterwards, the honeybee proboscis extension reflex was used to investigate the possible role of trophallaxis in learning olfactory cues. The results demonstrate unambiguously that associative learning actually occurs by means of trophallaxis. Animals associate the odour (as the conditioned stimulus or CS) and the sucrose (as the unconditioned stimulus or US) present in the solution they receive through trophallaxis. Moreover, this particular kind of learning leads to long-term olfactory memories after a single learning trial, even when trophallaxis is brief. In addition, we found that the strength of association is clearly affected by CS and US intensity as well as the recent previous foraging experiences of the animals. Comparisons are presented among several features of the learning during trophallaxis and the classical conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex with restrained subjects. Finally, the relevance of learning through trophallaxis in the task of successful foraging is discussed.Fil:Gil, M. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.Fil:De Marco, R.J. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.2005info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00220949_v208_n4_p671_GilJ. Exp. Biol. 2005;208(4):671-680reponame:Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)instname:Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturalesinstacron:UBA-FCENenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar2025-09-29T13:42:54Zpaperaa:paper_00220949_v208_n4_p671_GilInstitucionalhttps://digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttps://digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar/cgi-bin/oaiserver.cgiana@bl.fcen.uba.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:18962025-09-29 13:42:56.117Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN) - Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturalesfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Olfactory learning by means of trophallaxis in Apis mellifera
title Olfactory learning by means of trophallaxis in Apis mellifera
spellingShingle Olfactory learning by means of trophallaxis in Apis mellifera
Gil, M.
Apis mellifera
Associative learning
Honeybee
Olfactory conditioning
Trophallaxis
analysis of variance
animal
article
association
bee
comparative study
conditioned reflex
feeding behavior
learning
odor
physiology
Analysis of Variance
Animals
Association Learning
Bees
Conditioning, Classical
Cues
Feeding Behavior
Odors
Smell
Animalia
Apis mellifera
title_short Olfactory learning by means of trophallaxis in Apis mellifera
title_full Olfactory learning by means of trophallaxis in Apis mellifera
title_fullStr Olfactory learning by means of trophallaxis in Apis mellifera
title_full_unstemmed Olfactory learning by means of trophallaxis in Apis mellifera
title_sort Olfactory learning by means of trophallaxis in Apis mellifera
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gil, M.
De Marco, R.J.
author Gil, M.
author_facet Gil, M.
De Marco, R.J.
author_role author
author2 De Marco, R.J.
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Apis mellifera
Associative learning
Honeybee
Olfactory conditioning
Trophallaxis
analysis of variance
animal
article
association
bee
comparative study
conditioned reflex
feeding behavior
learning
odor
physiology
Analysis of Variance
Animals
Association Learning
Bees
Conditioning, Classical
Cues
Feeding Behavior
Odors
Smell
Animalia
Apis mellifera
topic Apis mellifera
Associative learning
Honeybee
Olfactory conditioning
Trophallaxis
analysis of variance
animal
article
association
bee
comparative study
conditioned reflex
feeding behavior
learning
odor
physiology
Analysis of Variance
Animals
Association Learning
Bees
Conditioning, Classical
Cues
Feeding Behavior
Odors
Smell
Animalia
Apis mellifera
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Early reports indicate that trophallaxis, i.e. the exchange of liquid food by mouth, may allow honeybees to assign nectar odours with predictive values to anticipate biological meaningful reward stimuli. Nevertheless, this type of learning has not been addressed directly. In the present study, pairs of animals were isolated to induce trophallaxis under controlled conditions and, afterwards, the honeybee proboscis extension reflex was used to investigate the possible role of trophallaxis in learning olfactory cues. The results demonstrate unambiguously that associative learning actually occurs by means of trophallaxis. Animals associate the odour (as the conditioned stimulus or CS) and the sucrose (as the unconditioned stimulus or US) present in the solution they receive through trophallaxis. Moreover, this particular kind of learning leads to long-term olfactory memories after a single learning trial, even when trophallaxis is brief. In addition, we found that the strength of association is clearly affected by CS and US intensity as well as the recent previous foraging experiences of the animals. Comparisons are presented among several features of the learning during trophallaxis and the classical conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex with restrained subjects. Finally, the relevance of learning through trophallaxis in the task of successful foraging is discussed.
Fil:Gil, M. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.
Fil:De Marco, R.J. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.
description Early reports indicate that trophallaxis, i.e. the exchange of liquid food by mouth, may allow honeybees to assign nectar odours with predictive values to anticipate biological meaningful reward stimuli. Nevertheless, this type of learning has not been addressed directly. In the present study, pairs of animals were isolated to induce trophallaxis under controlled conditions and, afterwards, the honeybee proboscis extension reflex was used to investigate the possible role of trophallaxis in learning olfactory cues. The results demonstrate unambiguously that associative learning actually occurs by means of trophallaxis. Animals associate the odour (as the conditioned stimulus or CS) and the sucrose (as the unconditioned stimulus or US) present in the solution they receive through trophallaxis. Moreover, this particular kind of learning leads to long-term olfactory memories after a single learning trial, even when trophallaxis is brief. In addition, we found that the strength of association is clearly affected by CS and US intensity as well as the recent previous foraging experiences of the animals. Comparisons are presented among several features of the learning during trophallaxis and the classical conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex with restrained subjects. Finally, the relevance of learning through trophallaxis in the task of successful foraging is discussed.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00220949_v208_n4_p671_Gil
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_00220949_v208_n4_p671_Gil
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv J. Exp. Biol. 2005;208(4):671-680
reponame:Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
instname:Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
instacron:UBA-FCEN
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
collection Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
instacron_str UBA-FCEN
institution UBA-FCEN
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN) - Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ana@bl.fcen.uba.ar
_version_ 1844618735071002624
score 13.070432