Authors: Moles, Angela; Peco, Begoña; Wallis, Ian R.; Foley, William J.; Poore, Alistair G.B.; Seabloom, Eric William; Vesk, Peter A.; Bisigato, Alejandro Jorge; Cella Pizarro, Lucrecia; Clark, Connie J.; Cohen, Philippe S.; Cornwell, William K.; Edwards, Will; Ejrnæs, Rasmus; Gonzales‐Ojeda, Therany; Graae, Bente J.; Hay, Gregory; Lumbwe, Fainess C.; Magaña‐Rodríguez, Benjamín; Moore, Ben D.; Peri, Pablo Luis; Poulsen, John R.; Stegen, James C.; Veldtman, Ruan; Zeipel, Hugo von; Andrew, Nigel R.; Boulter, Sarah L.; Borer, Elizabeth T.; Cornelissen, Johannes H.C.; Farji Brener, Alejandro Gustavo; DeGabriel, Jane L.; Jurado, Enrique; Kyhn, Line A.; Low, Bill; Mulder, Christa P.H.; Reardon Smith, Kathryn; Rodrıguez Velazquez, Jorge; De Fortier, An; Zheng, Zheng; Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo; Enquist, Brian J.; Facelli, Jose M.; Knight, Tiffany; Majer, Jonathan D.; Martinez Ramos, Miguel; McQuillan, Peter; Hui, Francis K.C.
Publication Date: 2013.
Language: English.
Abstract:
Most plant species have a range of traits that deter herbivores. However, understanding of how different defences are related to one another is surprisingly weak. Many authors argue that defence traits trade off against one another, while others argue that they form coordinated defence syndromes. We collected a dataset of unprecedented taxonomic and geographic scope (261 species spanning 80 families, from 75 sites across the globe) to investigate relationships among four chemical and six physical defences. Five of the 45 pairwise correlations between defence traits were significant and three of these were tradeoffs. The relationship between species’ overall chemical and physical defence levels was marginally nonsignificant (P = 0.08), and remained nonsignificant after accounting for phylogeny, growth form and abundance. Neither categorical principal component analysis (PCA) nor hierarchical cluster analysis supported the idea that species displayed defence syndromes. Our results do not support arguments for tradeoffs or for coordinated defence syndromes. Rather, plants display a range of combinations of defence traits. We suggest this lack of consistent defence syndromes may be adaptive, resulting from selective pressure to deploy a different combination of defences to coexisting species.
EEA Santa Cruz
Author affiliation: Moles, Angela. The University of New South Wales. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences. Evolution & Ecology Research Centre; Australia
Author affiliation: Peco, Begoña. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Facultad de Ciencias. Departamento Interuniversitario de Ecología. Terrestrial Ecology Group; España
Author affiliation: Wallis, Ian R.. Australian National University. Research School of Biology; Australia
Author affiliation: Foley, William J. Australian National University. Research School of Biology; Australia
Author affiliation: Poore, Alistair G.B. The University of New South Wales. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences. Evolution & Ecology Research Centre; Australia
Author affiliation: Seabloom, Eric W. University of Minnesota. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior; Estados Unidos
Author affiliation: Vesk, Peter A. University of Melbourne. School of Botany; Australia
Author affiliation: Bisigato, Alejandro Jorge. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Author affiliation: Cella Pizarro, Lucrecia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Author affiliation: Clark, Connie J. Woods Hole Research Center; Estados Unidos
Author affiliation: Cohen, Philippe S. Stanford University. Jasper Ridge Biological Preserve; Estados Unidos
Author affiliation: Cornwell, William K. Vrije Universiteit. Department of Systems Ecology. Institute of Ecological Science; Holanda
Author affiliation: Edwards, Will. James Cook University. School of Marine and Tropical Biology and Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science; Australia
Author affiliation: Ejrnæs, Rasmus. University of Aarhus. National Environmental Research Institute; Dinamarca
Author affiliation: Gonzales‐Ojeda, Therany. Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Medio Ambiente; Perú
Author affiliation: Graae, Bente J. Umeå University. Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. Climate Impacts Research Centre; Suecia. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Department of Biology; Noruega
Author affiliation: Hay, Gregory. University of Adelaide. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences; Australia
Author affiliation: Lumbwe, Fainess C. University of Zambia. Department of Biological Sciences; Zambia
Author affiliation: Magaña‐Rodríguez, Benjamín. Victoria University of Wellington. School of Biological Sciences; Nueva Zelanda
Author affiliation: Moore, Ben D. James Cook University. School of Marine and Tropical Biology and Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science; Australia. University of Western Sydney. Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment; Australia
Author affiliation: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Author affiliation: Poulsen, John R. Woods Hole Research Center; Estados Unidos
Author affiliation: Stegen, James C. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Biological Sciences Division; Estados Unidos
Author affiliation: Veldtman, Ruan. Stellenbosch University. Department of Botany and Zoology. Centre for Invasion Biology; Sudáfrica. South African National Biodiversity Institute. Kirstenbosch Research Centre; Sudáfrica
Author affiliation: Zeipel, Hugo von. Mid Sweden University. Department of Natural Sciences; Suecia
Author affiliation: Andrew, Nigel R. University of New England. Centre for Behavioural and Physiological Ecology, Zoology; Australia
Author affiliation: Boulter, Sarah L. Griffith University. Griffith School of Environment. Environmental Futures Centre; Australia
Author affiliation: Borer, Elizabeth T. University of Minnesota. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior; Estados Unidos
Author affiliation: Cornelissen, Johannes H. C. Vrije Unviversiteit. Department of Systems Ecology. Institute of Ecological Science; Holanda
Author affiliation: Farji Brener, Alejandro Gustavo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Author affiliation: DeGabriel, Jane L. James Cook University. School of Marine and Tropical Biology; Australia
Author affiliation: Jurado, Enrique. Universidad de Nuevo León. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales; México
Author affiliation: Kyhn, Line A. University of Aarhus. National Environmental Research Institute; Dinamarca
Author affiliation: Low, Bill. Low Ecological Services; Australia
Author affiliation: Mulder, Christa P.H. University of Alaska Fairbanks. Institute of Arctic Biology and Department of Biology and Wildlife; Estados Unidos
Author affiliation: Reardon Smith, Kathryn. University of Southern Queensland. Australian Centre for Sustainable Catchments; Australia
Author affiliation: Rodrıguez Velazquez, Jorge. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas; México
Author affiliation: De Fortier, An. University of Zululand. Department of Zoology; Sudáfrica
Author affiliation: Zheng, Zheng. Chinese Academy of Sciences. Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden; República de China
Author affiliation: Blendinger, Pedro Gerardo. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional.; Argentina
Author affiliation: Enquist, Brian J. University of Arizona. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology; Estados Unidos
Author affiliation: Facelli, Jose M. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Department of Biology; Noruega
Author affiliation: Knight, Tiffany. Washington University in St. Louis. Department of Biology; Estados Unidos
Author affiliation: Majer, Jonathan D. Curtin University. Curtin Institute for Biodiversity and Climate; Australia
Author affiliation: Martinez Ramos, Miguel. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas; México
Author affiliation: McQuillan, Peter. University of Tasmania. School of Geography & Environmental Studies; Australia
Author affiliation: Hui, Francis K.C. The University of New South Wales. School of Mathematics and Statistics and Evolution & Ecology Research Centre; Australia
Keywords: Plantas; Herbívoros; Respuesta a la Selección; Nectarios; Taninos; Plants; Herbivores; Selection Responses; Nectaries; Tannins; Compensaciones.
Repository: INTA Digital (INTA). Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria